IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Do obese patients stay longer in hospital? Estimating the health care costs of obesity

Listed author(s):
  • Katharina Hauck


    (Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics, Monash University)

  • Bruce Hollingsworth


    (Centre for Health Economics, Monash University)

Objective To determine if obese patients have longer average length of stay once they are admitted to hospital, across a range of specialties. This contributes to measuring the impact of obesity on health care resource use. Data Sources/Study Setting Administrative hospital data are used for the financial year 2005/06 covering all episodes of patient care (1.3 million) in 122 public hospitals in the state of Victoria, Australia. The data are collected as part of Diagnosis Related Group (DRG) case mix funding arrangements by the state government. Study Design Statistical analysis are undertaken using quantile regression analysis to determine differences in average length of stay within different specialties for two groups of patients, those classified as obese, and those not classified as obese. Quantile regression allows a comparison of differences between the length of stay of obese and non-obese patients across the whole distribution of length of stay of inpatients, in contrast to more commonly used statistical methods which use only the mean. We condition on a range of patient and hospital characteristics such as age, sex, socioeconomic status, medical complexity of patients, teaching status, size and location of hospitals. Data Collection/Extraction Methods Data on inpatient episodes with at least one overnight stay in hospital are used. We exclude episodes with missing information on one or more of the explanatory variables and we exclude specialties with less than 50 reported obese inpatients per financial year. The final sample consists of just over 460,000 observations. Principal Findings Large and significant differences in average length of stay are found between obese and non-obese patients for nearly all specialties. In some specialties, obese patients can stay up to 4 days longer. However, obesity does not necessarily lead to longer hospital stays. In a range of specialties, obese patients have shorter length of stay on average. In general, differences between obese and non-obese patients are more pronounced at greater levels of medical complexity. There is some evidence that differences may arise because obese patients are more likely to be treated medically rather than surgically, to be transferred to another hospital, thus shifting risks and costs, or to die from higher complication rates. Conclusions Our study sheds new light on the impact of obesity on health care costs. We demonstrate that an analysis across the whole spectrum of medical complexity provides much better estimates of resource use by obese patients than standard techniques. Future research should focus on differences in the way obese patients are managed in hospital. This will show where resource use is most intense, and help policy makers and hospital managers increase efficiency and quality of care for obese patients.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by Monash University, Centre for Health Economics in its series Centre for Health Economics Research Papers with number 28/08.

in new window

Length: 32 pages
Date of creation: May 2008
Handle: RePEc:mhe:cherps:2008-28
Contact details of provider: Postal:
Centre for Health Economics, Monash University, Building 75, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia

Phone: +61-3-9905-0733
Fax: +61-3-9905-8344
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mhe:cherps:2008-28. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Teresa Cheong)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.