Making The Stability Pact More Flexible: Does It Lead to Procyclical Fiscal Policies?
One of the often discussed negative aspects of the Stability and Growth Pact is the rigidity of its deficit rule. Several reform proposals aim currently at alleviating the rule in order to allow the automatic stabilizers to operate freely. However, such a reform is likely to cause even further deterioration of fiscal balances in the member countries. The empirical evidence presented in this paper shows that, in the past, increasing the structural deficit had a strong negative impact on a degree of anti-cyclical fiscal stabilization. This suggests that the reform of the Pact, through higher structural deficits, can decrease rather then increase the scope of anti-cyclical fiscal actions in the EMU member countries.
|Date of creation:||Mar 2005|
|Date of revision:||May 2006|
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.ke.uni.lodz.pl|
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ldz:wpaper:0099. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Michal Mackiewicz)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.