IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Ist die Finanzpolitik der Bundesländer nachhaltig?

  • Astrid Rosenschon
Registered author(s):

    The paper deals with the issue in how far the fiscal policy of the German Laender can be considered as sustainable. Comparing the fiscal policy stance and budgets of the 16 German states, only Bavaria and Saxony are pursuing a fiscal policy which may be labelled as sustainable. The other states did not succeed in their attempt to stabilize, least of all to reduce, their public debt relative to their GDP. The greatest deviation from a sustainable budget is reported for Berlin with a "non-sustainability gap" of 6.38 per cent of GDP, followed by Saxony-Anhalt (1.77 per cent of GDP) holding the largest debt ratio among German non-city states. Bremen and Saarland are exceptional cases; both did not have a "non-sustainability gap" in 2001 but, at the same time, receive federal funds since 1994 which are earmarked to redeem former excessive debts.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL: https://www.ifw-members.ifw-kiel.de/publications/ist-die-finanzpolitik-der-bundeslander-nachhaltig/kap1173.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by Kiel Institute for the World Economy in its series Kiel Working Papers with number 1173.

    as
    in new window

    Length: 30 pages
    Date of creation: Jun 2003
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:kie:kieliw:1173
    Contact details of provider: Postal: Kiellinie 66, D-24105 Kiel
    Phone: +49 431 8814-1
    Fax: +49 431 85853
    Web page: http://www.ifw-kiel.deEmail:


    More information through EDIRC

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    as in new window
    1. Alan J. Auerbach & Jagadeesh Gokhale & Laurence J. Kotlikoff, 1991. "Generational accounts: a meaningful alternative to deficit accounting," Working Paper 9103, Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland.
    2. Astrid Rosenschon, 2003. "Zur Finanzlage Berlins � ein Vergleich mit Hamburg," Kiel Working Papers 1146, Kiel Institute for the World Economy.
    3. Olivier Jean Blanchard, 1990. "Suggestions for a New Set of Fiscal Indicators," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 79, OECD Publishing.
    4. Huber, Bernd & Milbrandt, Beate & Runkel, Marco, 2002. "Die Finanzkrise Berlins: Eine Analyse der Nachhaltigkeit der Berliner Finanzpolitik," Wirtschaftsdienst – Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftspolitik (1998 - 2007), ZBW – German National Library of Economics / Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 82(7), pages 395-401.
    5. Kitterer, Wolfgang & Raffelhüschen, Bernd, 2002. "Mehr Nachhaltigkeit in der Finanzpolitik," Wirtschaftsdienst – Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftspolitik (1998 - 2007), ZBW – German National Library of Economics / Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 82(2), pages 67-73.
    6. Boss, Alfred & Lorz, Jens Oliver, 1995. "Die öffentliche Verschuldung in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland: Ausmaß und Belastungswirkung," Kiel Working Papers 669, Kiel Institute for the World Economy.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kie:kieliw:1173. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dieter Stribny)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.