IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/jen/jenjbe/2010-12.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Vis-à-vis vs. mixed dock door assignment: A comparison of different cross dock layouts

Author

Listed:
  • Konrad Stephan

    () (School of Economics and Business Administration, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena)

  • Nils Boysen

    () (School of Economics and Business Administration, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena)

Abstract

An important decision problem during the layout phase of a cross dock is related to the arrangement of inbound and outbound operations within a terminal. Either one side of the terminal is exclusively dedicated to inbound and the other to outbound destinations (vis-à-vis policy) or inbound and outbound destinations can facultatively be assigned all around the terminal (mix policy). The latter policy promises more flexibility, when finally assigning dock doors to truck destinations during operational planning, but comes for the price of ambiguous material flows and potential congestions inside the terminal. Both policies are compared with regard to their impact on operational planning, where deterministic, stochastic and unknown inbound loads are differentiated. Our results show the mix policy being superior in most cases except for unknown inbound loads.

Suggested Citation

  • Konrad Stephan & Nils Boysen, 2010. "Vis-à-vis vs. mixed dock door assignment: A comparison of different cross dock layouts," Jena Research Papers in Business and Economics - Working and Discussion Papers (Expired!) 12/2010, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, School of Economics and Business Administration.
  • Handle: RePEc:jen:jenjbe:2010-12
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12063-011-0057-3
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    Keywords

    logistics; cross docking; door-layout;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jen:jenjbe:2010-12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (). General contact details of provider: http://www.wiwi.uni-jena.de/ .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.