IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/jen/jenjbe/2008-11.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Scheduling freight trains in rail-rail transshipment yards

Author

Listed:
  • Nils Boysen

    () (Lehrstuhl für Allgemeine Betriebswirtschaftslehre / Operations Management Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena)

  • Erwin Pesch

    () (Institut für Wirtschaftsinformatik, Universität Siegen)

Abstract

Transshipment yards, where gantry cranes allow for an effcient transshipment of containers between different freight trains, are important entities in modern railway systems and facilitate the general shift from point-to-point transport to hub-and-spoke railway systems. Modern rail-rail transshipment yards accelerate container handling, so that multiple smaller trains with equal destination can be consolidated to a reduced number of trains without jeopardizing on time deliveries. An important problem continuously arising during the daily operations of a transshipment yard is the train scheduling problem, which decides on the succession of trains at the parallel railway tracks. This problem with a special focus on resolving deadlocks and avoiding multiple crane picks per container move is investigated within the paper on hand. A mathematical program along with a complexity proof is provided and exact (Dynamic Programming) and heuristic (Beam Search) procedures are described.

Suggested Citation

  • Nils Boysen & Erwin Pesch, 2008. "Scheduling freight trains in rail-rail transshipment yards," Jena Research Papers in Business and Economics - Working and Discussion Papers (Expired!) 11/2008, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, School of Economics and Business Administration.
  • Handle: RePEc:jen:jenjbe:2008-11
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/trsc.1100.0365
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ballis, Athanasios & Golias, John, 2002. "Comparative evaluation of existing and innovative rail-road freight transport terminals," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 593-611, August.
    2. Freling, R. & Lentink, R.M. & Kroon, L.G. & Huisman, D., 2002. "Shunting of Passenger Train Units in a Railway Station," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2002-74-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    3. Nils Boysen & Malte Fliedner & Armin Scholl, 2007. "Sequencing Mixed-Model Assembly Lines to Minimize Part Inventory Cost," Jena Research Papers in Business and Economics - Working and Discussion Papers (Expired!) 03/2007, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, School of Economics and Business Administration.
    4. Macharis, C. & Bontekoning, Y. M., 2004. "Opportunities for OR in intermodal freight transport research: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 153(2), pages 400-416, March.
    5. He, Shiwei & Song, Rui & Chaudhry, Sohail S., 2000. "Fuzzy dispatching model and genetic algorithms for railyards operations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 124(2), pages 307-331, July.
    6. Sabuncuoglu, Ihsan & Gocgun, Yasin & Erel, Erdal, 2008. "Backtracking and exchange of information: Methods to enhance a beam search algorithm for assembly line scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(3), pages 915-930, May.
    7. Harald Rotter, 2004. "New operating concepts for intermodal transport: The mega hub in Hanover/Lehrte in Germany," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(5), pages 347-365, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Boysen, Nils & Fliedner, Malte, 2010. "Determining crane areas in intermodal transshipment yards: The yard partition problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 204(2), pages 336-342, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Railway Systems; Transshipment Yard; Train Scheduling; Dynamic Programming; Beam Search;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jen:jenjbe:2008-11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (). General contact details of provider: http://www.wiwi.uni-jena.de/ .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.