IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

How can we explain the gender wealth gap in France?


  • Carole Bonnet


  • Alice Keogh


  • Benoît Rapoport



One can find an extensive literature analyzing the gender wage gap. In contrast, wealth inequalities remains relatively unexplored. However, wealth is an important indicator of economic well-being, whether one focuses on the inequalities within the population as a whole or within a specific household. Using data from the 2003-2004 and 2009-2010 French Household Wealth surveys, we find that the gross wealth of men is roughly 15% higher than that of women. The gap is noticeably larger for financial assets (roughly 37%) than for real estate (4% for primary residence in 2009). However, an OLS regression shows that, all other things being equal, women’s wealth is more important. In order to better highlight the factors that explain this wealth gap, we make use of the semi-parametric decomposition method developed by DiNardo, Fortin and Lemieux (1996). We thus decompose the gaps not only at the average (as one might do with the Oaxaca and Blinder method) but also at other points of the wealth distribution. This is important because this distribution is asymmetric. We show that the gender wealth gap is predominantly explained by the differences in the distribution of individual characteristics (especially those related to the labour market - income, status and experience). However, the gap is reduced by the better returns on women’s characteristics (which corresponds to the unexplained share of the decomposition). In other words, women derive more wealth from their characteristics than men do.

Suggested Citation

  • Carole Bonnet & Alice Keogh & Benoît Rapoport, 2013. "How can we explain the gender wealth gap in France?," Working Papers 191, Institut National d'Études Démographiques (INED).
  • Handle: RePEc:idg:wpaper:191

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:idg:wpaper:191. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Ined). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.