IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Why don't they answer? Unit non-response in the IAB Establishment Panel

Listed author(s):
  • Janik, Florian

    (Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany])

  • Kohaut, Susanne


    (Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany])

Registered author(s):

    "With the IAB Establishment Panel the Institute for Employment Research (Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung - IAB) has conducted a large-scale annual establishment survey in western Germany since 1993 and also in eastern Germany since 1996, covering some 15,500 establishments in the meantime. In this panel survey the establishments are asked in face-to-face interviews1 to provide information on key determinants of employment. The IAB Establishment Panel is a survey in which the same establishments are contacted each year. New establishments are added to the sample each year in order to depict structural change. Furthermore additional establishments have to be included in the sample to replace those which have dropped out of the sample in the course of time. For despite all efforts, one problem arises in every survey: individual establishments' unwillingness to participate, which leads to so-called non-response. Two forms of non-response can be distinguished. First, an establishment may refuse to participate in the survey at all (unit non-response). Second, participating establishments may fail to answer individual questions in the questionnaire (item non-response). Both types of non-response can lead to biased results if the cases of non-response are not random. Unit non-response leads to greater problems, however, as no interview is available for these establishments and it is not just the case that individual questions are not answered. Experience made with the IAB Establishment Panel shows that the willingness of establishments surveyed for the first time to participate in the survey is clearly lower, at 36 percent, than that of establishments which have already been included in the survey at least once. Furthermore the unit non-response of establishments surveyed for the first time has increased in the past few years. The willingness of the panel establishments, in other words the repeat respondents from previous years, to complete the questionnaire is considerably higher at about 80 percent. There is no indication that the willingness to participate is declining over the years. The advantage of panel surveys is also that a wealth of establishment information is available from previous years for the establishments which have been surveyed repeatedly but which no longer respond and this can be used to model the non-response process. On the other hand little information is available about the establishments which are included in the survey for the first time. It is important to analyse the non-response processes in order to gain the most precise insight possible into the survey process. The findings obtained in this way make it possible to optimise the fieldwork management, thus contributing to quality improvements and possibly to cost reductions. In addition to this, the analyses can reveal any selectivities that may lead to biased estimates. The representativeness of the projection of all variables can also be jeopardised by possible selectivities. Furthermore, in panel surveys selectivities may intensify over time. The aim of this paper is to examine the unit non-response of establishments which have already taken part in the survey at least once and are approached again. On the basis of an extended conceptual framework for establishment surveys, determinants that influence the non-response process are to be brought out. For the first time for establishment surveys the interviewer's influence on the success of the interview is taken into account both in the conceptual framework and in the analyses." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany] in its series FDZ Methodenreport with number 200907_en.

    in new window

    Length: 27 pages
    Date of creation: 27 Aug 2009
    Publication status: published in: Quality and Quantity. International Journal of Methodology, Vol. 46, No. 4 (2012), p. 917-934
    Handle: RePEc:iab:iabfme:200907_en
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    Regensburger Str. 104, D-90327 Nürnberg

    Phone: 0911/179-1752
    Fax: 0911/179-1728
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iab:iabfme:200907_en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (IAB, Geschäftsbereich Dokumentation und Bibliothek)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.