Liquidity and Capital Requirements and the Probability of Bank Failure
Using the model of Rochet and Vives (2004), this note shows that a prudential regulator can in general not mitigate a bankâ€™s failure risk solely by means of liquidity requirements. However, their effectiveness can be restored if, in addition, minimum capital requirements are met. This provides a rationale for capital requirements beyond the commonly envoked reasoning that they are to be used to control the riskiness of banksâ€™ asset portfolios.
|Date of creation:||May 2010|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
Web page: http://sfb649.wiwi.hu-berlin.de
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hum:wpaper:sfb649dp2010-027. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (RDC-Team)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.