IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Payments Remain Fundamental for Banks and Central Banks

  • Pauli, Ralf

    (Bank of Finland)

Registered author(s):

    Is commercial banking in the traditional sense obsolete? Are we in fact witnessing the emergence of a fundamentally new era of finance and payments intermediation? These questions are raised in this paper. Instead of a formal analysis, an attempt is made here to approach these questions from a historical perspective and a practitioner's standpoint. Which factors have in the course of time shaped the role of commercial banks and are present trends in the market eroding the foundation of traditional commercial bank functions to the extent that we are actually entering upon something that is new in a fundamental way. Of course, we will not get definitive answers. The conclusion arrived at in the paper is that banks will remain important intermediators of financing and payments, and that these functions will constitute the core of banking also in the foreseeable future. This however does not exclude structural changes in the banking sector as a whole and in the activities of individual banks. On the contrary, these are essential to the survival of banks. The paper analyses prospects for new media of exchange replacing deposit money. It is concluded that, as regards asset transfers in the capital market becoming a dominant medium of exchange (in the spirit of the New Monetary Economics), there are serious impediments. Payment flows have increased sharply at the same time as the whole banking sector has been making the adjustment to a more competitive situation. This has accentuated the role of the central bank as a payments service provider to the banks and particularly as an overseer of payment systems. The central bank's role as payment systems overseer is likely to receive even greater emphasis in the future. The central bank's oversight mandate requires further specification as regards the payment systems to be overseen and how oversight relates to banking supervision. Our analysis demonstrates also that current trends in the market are not weakening but rather are strengthening the traditional interrelationship between banks and the central bank in the field of payments. The roles of the banks and the central bank still need fine tuning. It is concluded that payment systems can best serve the rest of the economy if the prime responsibility to develop the systems is left to the private sector, while the central bank has a recognized position as a public policy entity that will do what is necessary to achieve a sufficient level of safety and efficiency.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by Bank of Finland in its series Research Discussion Papers with number 6/2000.

    in new window

    Length: 40 pages
    Date of creation: 26 Jun 2000
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:hhs:bofrdp:2000_006
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    Bank of Finland, P.O. Box 160, FI-00101 Helsinki, Finland

    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    as in new window
    1. Angelini, Paolo, 1998. "An analysis of competitive externalities in gross settlement systems," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 1-18, January.
    2. Angela Redish, 1993. "Anchors Aweigh: The Transition from Commodity Money to Fiat Money in Western Economies," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 26(4), pages 777-95, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hhs:bofrdp:2000_006. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Minna Nyman)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.