IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Systemic Risk in the Finnish Payment System: an Empirical Investigation

  • Kuussaari, Harri


    (Bank of Finland)

Registered author(s):

    The volume of large-value funds transfers in the money, foreign exchange and securities markets has increased manifold during the last decade. This development has increased interbank debt positions and extensions of intraday credit resulting from payment transactions in the payment-intermediation sector. Systemic risk in these arrangements refers to the risk that one clearing system participant's failure to settle will cause one or more other participants to default. The danger of systemic failure exists in a clearing system in which payment messages are exchanged during the day but funds are transferred only at the end of the day. In this study, simulation with empirical data is used to measure the probability, extent and resulting effects of a systemic crisis in the Finnish payment system. The major finding of the study is that one participant's failure to settle in the Finnish payment system can cause serious problems for other participants but the danger of systemic failure is relatively small. On average the banks' largest counterparty risks are low and amount to less than 10 per cent of their own funds. However, on some days counterparty risk can amount to over 50 per cent of banks' own funds and thus constitute a systemic risk. Large counterparty risks however do not form long interbank chains that could lead to a domino effect. Even should a payment system participant suddenly be unable to settle, the other participants would probably manage to avoid serious problems. Although the simulation results indicate that presently the probability of systemic crisis in Finland is quite small, it is still important that payment system risk control be further developed. The environment in which the payment system operates is developing very rapidly, and risks are growing as volumes increase. As the system opens up to foreign credit institutions, Finnish payment system participants also find themselves dealing with more and more counterparties about whom they have no prior knowledge. System entry and risk control can no longer be based solely on trust; clear game rules are needed. As part of its task of overseeing payment systems, the central bank will need to closely monitor system developments, promote risk awareness in the markets and payment systems, and prevent the creation of systems in which it is possible for settlement failures to spread. This work should be done in cooperation with international organizations and the EU.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by Bank of Finland in its series Research Discussion Papers with number 3/1996.

    in new window

    Length: 35 pages
    Date of creation: 14 Feb 1996
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:hhs:bofrdp:1996_003
    Contact details of provider: Postal: Bank of Finland, P.O. Box 160, FI-00101 Helsinki, Finland
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hhs:bofrdp:1996_003. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Minna Nyman)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.