Un modèle explicatif du vote FNSEA aux élections des Chambres d'agriculture départementales (1995 - 2001)
This article constitues an extension of the economic voting field to the not yet explored domain of professionnal elections. It studies the vote in favour of the FNSEA at the departemental Chambers of Agriculture's elections from 1995 to 2001. This analysis shows that the vote for the FNSEA is positively related to the variations of farmer's income as well as to the number of new installations, exhibiting then an egotropic and sociotropic dimension of this vote. Furthermore, the support provided to the FNSEA varies according to the type of agriculture production. The Federation thus obtains better scores in beet farming territories, whereas there is no specific trend in the vote of cereal farming regions. Finally, the low turnout as these elections gives a real advantage to the FNSEA.
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.
|Date of creation:||2009|
|Publication status:||Published in Economie Rurale, Société Française d'Économie Rurale, 2009, pp.32-51. 〈http://economierurale.revues.org/827#quotation〉. 〈10.4000/economierurale.827〉|
|Note:||View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00433069|
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:cesptp:hal-00433069. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (CCSD)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.