IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/gig/wpaper/215.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Long-Term Monarchical Survival in the Middle East: A Configurational Comparison, 1945–2012

Author

Listed:
  • André Bank

    () (GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies)

  • Thomas Richter

    () (GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies)

  • Anna Sunik

    () (GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies)

Abstract

The rationale is straightforward and persuasive: intrastate conflicts are by definition subnational phenomena. If we want to understand them fully, it may be wise to refocus our attention from the country level to the subnational level. Where violence is located might inform us as to why it erupts and how it is linked to various political, economic or social factors. The number of statistical geospatial analyses undertaken at the subnational level has been increasing constantly in recent years. Even though such studies have contributed greatly to peace and conflict research, they have come with their own challenges. Most importantly, they often do not adequately consider the theoretical and conceptual implications of switching from conventional cross-country to subnational analysis; this has led to dubious theoretical arguments and conclusions. Moreover, operationalization and measurement issues often limit these analyses’ explanatory power. The paper reviews several geospatial analyses of violent conflict, points out the limitations of the previous research and proposes some potential avenues for improvement.

Suggested Citation

  • André Bank & Thomas Richter & Anna Sunik, 2013. "Long-Term Monarchical Survival in the Middle East: A Configurational Comparison, 1945–2012," GIGA Working Paper Series 215, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies.
  • Handle: RePEc:gig:wpaper:215
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.giga-hamburg.de/dl/download.php?d=/content/publikationen/pdf/wp215_bank-richter-sunik.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. repec:eee:jcecon:v:45:y:2017:i:2:p:410-428 is not listed on IDEAS

    More about this item

    Keywords

    civil war; political violence; geospatial analysis; subnational analysis; causality;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gig:wpaper:215. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Bert Hoffmann) or (Howard Loewen). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/dueiide.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.