IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/gig/wpaper/189.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Finding the Cases that Fit: Methodological Challenges in Peace Research

Author

Listed:
  • Claudia Simons

    () (SWP Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik)

  • Franzisca Zanker

    () (GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies)

Abstract

Subnational comparative research has received increasing attention as a method that is academically rigorous and offers in ]depth knowledge about specific cases. However, the practical difficulties surrounding the selection of cases to be researched and compared are seldom discussed in a meaningful way in academic circles. Even though a research design may itself be very elaborate, we need significant information on the cases before we can actually decide on useful comparisons. Based on our experiences in studying how powersharing peace agreements affect the local level and why conflict dynamics often continue, we consider the following basic question: How do we actually know that a specific case suits a particular research design? The challenges we experienced in our research were twofold: first, how to conceptualize peace and identify indicators to measure the level of peacefulness; and second, how to obtain comprehensive and reliable disaggregated data on these indicators. By detailing our own experiences we hope to encourage a more open approach to the discussion of methodological challenges.

Suggested Citation

  • Claudia Simons & Franzisca Zanker, 2012. "Finding the Cases that Fit: Methodological Challenges in Peace Research," GIGA Working Paper Series 189, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies.
  • Handle: RePEc:gig:wpaper:189
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.giga-hamburg.de/dl/download.php?d=/content/publikationen/pdf/wp189_simons-zanker.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    Keywords

    methodology; data collection; peace research; comparative design; subnational research; post-conflict societies;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gig:wpaper:189. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Bert Hoffmann) or (Howard Loewen). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/dueiide.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.