IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/gig/wpaper/11.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Representing Different Constituencies: Electoral Rules in Bicameral Systems in Latin America and Their Impact on Political Representation

Author

Listed:
  • Detlef Nolte

    () (GIGA Institute for Ibero-American Studies)

  • Francisco Sánchez

    () (Instituto Interuniversitario de Iberoamérica y Portugal, University of Salamanca)

Abstract

This article analyzes the quantitative (mechanical) effects and qualitative (perceptions) effects on political representation of the election of two separate chambers in Latin America’s bicameral systems. After discussing the spread and strength of bicameralism in Latin America, we compare the different electoral systems for lower chambers and Senates. Our study shows that in a region characterized by relatively high levels of malapportionment in the first chamber, the second chamber reinforces the malapportionment in parliament. Representation tends to be much more disproportional in the upper chamber than in the lower house. Moreover, the differences in the electoral systems and district magnitudes for both chambers make it more difficult for women to win a seat in the Senate.

Suggested Citation

  • Detlef Nolte & Francisco Sánchez, 2005. "Representing Different Constituencies: Electoral Rules in Bicameral Systems in Latin America and Their Impact on Political Representation," GIGA Working Paper Series 11, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies.
  • Handle: RePEc:gig:wpaper:11
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://repec.giga-hamburg.de/pdf/giga_05_wp11_nolte-sanchez.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Samuels, David & Snyder, Richard, 2001. "The Value of a Vote: Malapportionment in Comparative Perspective," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 31(04), pages 651-671, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Latin America; Senates; bicameralism; electoral systems; malapportionment; gender quota;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gig:wpaper:11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Bert Hoffmann) or (Howard Loewen). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/dueiide.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.