IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Understanding Society Innovation Panel Wave 6: results from methodological experiments

Listed author(s):
  • Allum, Nick
  • Auspurg, Katrin
  • Blake, Margaret
  • Booker, Cara L.
  • Crossley, Thomas F.
  • d'Ardenne, Joanna
  • Fairbrother, Malcolm
  • Iacovou, Maria
  • Jäckle, Annette
  • Kaminska, Olena
  • Lynn, Peter
  • Nicoletti, Cheti
  • Oldfield, Zoe
  • Pudney, Stephen
  • Schnettler, Sebastian
  • Uhrig, S.C. Noah
  • Winter, Joachim

This paper presents some preliminary findings from Wave 6 of the Innovation Panel (IP6) of Understanding Society: The UK Household Longitudinal Study. Understanding Society is a major panel survey in the UK. In March 2013, the sixth wave of the Innovation Panel went into the field. IP6 used a mixed-mode design, using on-line interviews and face-to-face interviews. This paper describes the design of IP6, the experiments carried and the preliminary findings from early analysis of the data.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by Understanding Society at the Institute for Social and Economic Research in its series Understanding Society Working Paper Series with number 2014-04.

in new window

Date of creation: 16 Jul 2014
Publication status: published
Handle: RePEc:ese:ukhlsp:2014-04
Contact details of provider: Postal:
RAB Butler Building, University of Essex, Wivenhoe Park, Colchester, ESSEX C04 3SQ

Phone: +44 (0)1206 872957
Fax: +44 (0)1206 873151
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

in new window

  1. Koenker, Roger W & Bassett, Gilbert, Jr, 1978. "Regression Quantiles," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 46(1), pages 33-50, January.
  2. Auspurg, Katrin & Burton, Jonathan & Cullinane, Carl & Delavande, Adeline & Laura, Fumagalli & Iacovou, Maria & Jäckle, Annette & Kaminska, Olena & Lynn, Peter & Mathews, Paul & Nicolaas, Gerry & Nic, 2013. "Understanding Society Innovation Panel Wave 5: results from methodological experiments," Understanding Society Working Paper Series 2013-06, Understanding Society at the Institute for Social and Economic Research.
  3. Jäckle, Annette & Lynn, Peter & Burton, Jonathan, 2013. "Going online with a face-to-face household panel: initial results from an experiment on the Understanding Society Innovation Panel," Understanding Society Working Paper Series 2013-03, Understanding Society at the Institute for Social and Economic Research.
  4. Brewer, M & Etheridge, B & O'Dea, C, 2013. "Why are households that report the lowest incomes so well-off," Economics Discussion Papers 8993, University of Essex, Department of Economics.
  5. Taylor, Catherine J., 2014. "Physiological stress response to loss of social influence and threats to masculinity," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 51-59.
  6. Rolf Porst & Klaus Zeifang, 1987. "A Description of the German General Social Survey Test-Retest Study and a Report on the Stabilities of the Sociodemographic Variables," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 15(3), pages 177-218, February.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ese:ukhlsp:2014-04. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Jonathan Nears)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.