IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ese/ukhlsp/2013-07.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Longer interviews may not affect subsequent survey participation propensity

Author

Listed:
  • Lynn, Peter

Abstract

Researchers often assume that respondent burden influences survey participation propensity and that interview length is a good indicator of burden. However, there is little evidence of the effect of interview length on subsequent participation propensity, particularly for face-to-face surveys. In a randomised experiment, respondents experienced interviews of different lengths at wave 1 of a panel survey. Subsequently, they were asked to complete a self-completion questionnaire and to take part in further waves of the survey. Response rates to these subsequent tasks are compared between those administered the shorter and longer versions of the wave 1 interview. No evidence is found that wave 1 interview length affects subsequent participation propensity.

Suggested Citation

  • Lynn, Peter, 2013. "Longer interviews may not affect subsequent survey participation propensity," Understanding Society Working Paper Series 2013-07, Understanding Society at the Institute for Social and Economic Research.
  • Handle: RePEc:ese:ukhlsp:2013-07
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.understandingsociety.ac.uk/sites/default/files/downloads/working-papers/2013-07.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roberts, Caroline & Eva, Gillian & Allum, Nick & Lynn, Peter, 2010. "Data quality in telephone surveys and the effect of questionnaire length: a cross- national experiment," ISER Working Paper Series 2010-36, Institute for Social and Economic Research.
    2. Lynn, Peter, 2009. "Sample design for Understanding Society," Understanding Society Working Paper Series 2009-01, Understanding Society at the Institute for Social and Economic Research.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ese:ukhlsp:2013-07. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Jonathan Nears). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/rcessuk.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.