IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ese/ukhlsp/2013-06.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Understanding Society Innovation Panel Wave 5: results from methodological experiments

Author

Listed:
  • Auspurg, Katrin
  • Burton, Jonathan
  • Cullinane, Carl
  • Delavande, Adeline
  • Laura, Fumagalli
  • Iacovou, Maria
  • Jäckle, Annette
  • Kaminska, Olena
  • Lynn, Peter
  • Mathews, Paul
  • Nicolaas, Gerry
  • Nicoletti, Cheti
  • Ye, Cong
  • Zafar, Basit

Abstract

This paper presents some preliminary findings from Wave 5 of the Innovation Panel (IP5) of Understanding Society: The UK Household Longitudinal Study. Understanding Society is a major panel survey in the UK. In February 2012, the fifth wave of the Innovation Panel went into the field. IP5 used a mixed-mode design, using on-line interviews and face-to-face interviews. This paper describes the design of IP5, the experiments carried and the preliminary findings from early analysis of the data.

Suggested Citation

  • Auspurg, Katrin & Burton, Jonathan & Cullinane, Carl & Delavande, Adeline & Laura, Fumagalli & Iacovou, Maria & Jäckle, Annette & Kaminska, Olena & Lynn, Peter & Mathews, Paul & Nicolaas, Gerry & Nic, 2013. "Understanding Society Innovation Panel Wave 5: results from methodological experiments," Understanding Society Working Paper Series 2013-06, Understanding Society at the Institute for Social and Economic Research.
    • Handle: RePEc:ese:ukhlsp:2013-06
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.understandingsociety.ac.uk/sites/default/files/downloads/working-papers/2013-06.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Blanchflower, David G. & Oswald, Andrew J., 2004. "Well-being over time in Britain and the USA," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(7-8), pages 1359-1386, July.
    2. Easterlin, Richard A., 1995. "Will raising the incomes of all increase the happiness of all?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 35-47, June.
    3. Clark, Andrew E. & Oswald, Andrew J., 1996. "Satisfaction and comparison income," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(3), pages 359-381, September.
    4. Edward C. Norton & Hua Wang & Chunrong Ai, 2004. "Computing interaction effects and standard errors in logit and probit models," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 4(2), pages 154-167, June.
    5. Jo Blanden & Stephen Machin, 2013. "Educational Inequality and The Expansion of UK Higher Education," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 60(5), pages 578-596, November.
    6. Maria Iacovou & Lara Patrício Tavares, 2011. "Yearning, Learning, and Conceding: Reasons Men and Women Change Their Childbearing Intentions," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 37(1), pages 89-123, March.
    7. Allum, Nick & Auspurg, Katrin & Blake, Margaret & Booker, Cara L. & Crossley, Thomas F. & d'Ardenne, Joanna & Fairbrother, Malcolm & Iacovou, Maria & Jäckle, Annette & Kaminska, Olena & Lynn, Peter &, 2014. "Understanding Society Innovation Panel Wave 6: results from methodological experiments," Understanding Society Working Paper Series 2014-04, Understanding Society at the Institute for Social and Economic Research.
    8. Budd, Sarah & Gilbert, Emily & Burton, Jonathan & Jäckle, Annette & Kaminska, Olena & Uhrig, S.C. Noah & Brown, Matthew & Calderwood, Lisa, 2012. "Understanding Society Innovation Panel Wave 4: results from methodological experiments," Understanding Society Working Paper Series 2012-06, Understanding Society at the Institute for Social and Economic Research.
    9. Ronald Freedman & Albert Hermalin & Ming-Cheng Chang, 1975. "Do statements about desired family size predict fertility? the case of Taiwan, 1967–1970," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 12(3), pages 407-416, August.
    10. Betsey Stevenson & Justin Wolfers, 2009. "The Paradox of Declining Female Happiness," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 1(2), pages 190-225, August.
    11. Bartels, Larry M., 1999. "Panel Effects in the American National Election Studies," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(1), pages 1-20, January.
    12. Sala, Emanuela & Uhrig, S.C. Noah & Lynn, Peter, 2009. ""It is time computers do clever things!" The impact of dependent interviewing on interviewer burden," ISER Working Paper Series 2009-07, Institute for Social and Economic Research.
    13. Budd, Sarah & Burton, Jonathan & Gilbert, Emily & Jäckle, Annette & McFall, Stephanie L. & Uhrig, S.C. Noah, 2011. "Understanding Society Innovation Panel Wave 3: results from methodological experiments," Understanding Society Working Paper Series 2011-05, Understanding Society at the Institute for Social and Economic Research.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Auspurg, Katrin & Iacovou, Maria & Nicoletti, Cheti, 2014. "Housework Share between Partners: Experimental Evidence on Gender Identity," IZA Discussion Papers 8569, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    2. Allum, Nick & Auspurg, Katrin & Blake, Margaret & Booker, Cara L. & Crossley, Thomas F. & d'Ardenne, Joanna & Fairbrother, Malcolm & Iacovou, Maria & Jäckle, Annette & Kaminska, Olena & Lynn, Peter &, 2014. "Understanding Society Innovation Panel Wave 6: results from methodological experiments," Understanding Society Working Paper Series 2014-04, Understanding Society at the Institute for Social and Economic Research.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ese:ukhlsp:2013-06. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Jonathan Nears). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/rcessuk.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.