IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Benchmarking burgerzaken

  • van hulst, B.L.
  • Groot, H. Classification_JEL: R50, H72
Registered author(s):

    Benchmark Burgerzaken is een studie naar de kostendoelmatigheid van de afdeling Burgerzaken van gemeenten. De landelijke productiviteitsontwikkeling van burgerzaken blijkt sterk te fluctueren en mee te bewegen met het aantal afgenomen producten. De gemiddelde doelmatigheidsscore in 2008 is 86,2%. Wel bestaan er duidelijke verschillen in kostendoelmatigheid tussen gemeenten. Fusiegemeenten blijken een gemiddeld lagere doelmatigheidsscore voor de afdeling Burgerzaken te hebben. Dit geldt vooral voor recent heringedeelde gemeenten. Verder blijkt dat er voor het merendeel van de gemeenten schaalvoordelen zijn.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by Delft University of Technology, Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management in its series Economics and Management of Innovation Working Papers with number 2012-1.

    in new window

    Date of creation: 01 Feb 2012
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:dgr:tudemi:20121
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dgr:tudemi:20121. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (TU Delft Library Repository Team)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.