IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Accounting and business economics traditions in the Netherlands

  • Bouma, J.L.
  • Feenstra, D.W.
  • Huijgen, C.A.

    (Groningen University)

Registered author(s):

    Until the 1970’s Dutch accounting theorists generally showed a strong inclination towards the formulation of deductive theories. A set of different disciplines, all related to the problems of the business firm, made up a whole called bedrijfseconomie (business economics). The theory of value, which was tantamount to the theory of replacement value, was without doubt the core of bedrijfseconomie. This paper elaborates on the changes in contents an consequences of this theory of replacement value during the second part of this century. Since the seventies the construct of bedrijfseconomie has fallen apart. Each discipline formerly belonging to it, has independently found its tie-up with the respective international scientific developments. Bedrijfseconomie has lost its significance as a comprehensive academic discipline. Nowadays business economics has an important orientation towards US-literature. As an example of this trend we give a summary of Huijgen’s research who applied the Feltham-Ohlson framework on the accounting issue of goodwill.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management) in its series Research Report with number 99E43.

    in new window

    Date of creation: 1999
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:dgr:rugsom:99e43
    Contact details of provider: Postal: PO Box 800, 9700 AV Groningen
    Phone: +31 50 363 7185
    Fax: +31 50 363 3720
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dgr:rugsom:99e43. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Joke Bulthuis)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.