Learning, Rationality and Identity Building - From Simon To Varela
This paper focuses on the link between the economic conceptions of rationality and learning. Traditionally, most economists believe that learning is just a way for agents to become fully rational. But being fully rational cannot describe a process, for there is only one way to be rational in the economic sense of the term. Therefore, what economists have in mind is not the process of learning, but the result of learning: ‘a fully rational agent’. Heterodox rationality conceptions such as the Simonian model of bounded rationality seem more compatible with the idea of learning. Bounded rationality implies that agents may act differently to the same stimulus; it is therefore compatible with the idea of diversity, one of the foundations of the evolutionary logic. But following Simon, learning should not be considered as a creative process that allows a lot of diverse answers. If diversity exists in the agents’ behaviors, the way they learn appears to be unique. As a consequence, learning should decrease the strength of the selection forces, both processes being contradictory (Dosi et al. 2003). Our paper aims to overcome this contradiction by showing how intentionality and identity, and more broadly Fransisco Varela’s ‘enaction’ theory, can help to invent a concept of ‘rational learning’ that is compatible with the evolutionary logic.
|Date of creation:||2008|
|Date of revision:|
|Publication status:||Published in Selected Proceedings of the IAREP/SABE 2008 Conference at LUISS in Rome,|
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.dauphine.fr/en/welcome.html|
More information through EDIRC
References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Nicolai J. Foss, 2003. "Bounded rationality and tacit knowledge in the organizational capabilities approach: an assessment and a re-evaluation," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press, vol. 12(2), pages 185-201, April.
- Richard Arena & Nathalie Lazaric, 2003.
"La théorie évolutionniste du changement économique de Nelson et Winter : une analyse économique rétrospective,"
- Richard Arena & Nathalie Lazaric, 2003. "La théorie évolutionniste du changement économique de Nelson et Winter. Une analyse économique réprospective," Revue économique, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 54(2), pages 329-354.
- Pierre Garrouste, 1999. "Apprentissage, interactions, et création de connaissance," Revue d'Économie Industrielle, Programme National Persée, vol. 88(1), pages 137-151.
- Allison, G. & Fudenberg, D., 1992.
"Rules of Thumb for Social Learning,"
92-12, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Department of Economics.
- Ellison, Glenn & Fudenberg, Drew, 1992. "Rules of Thumb for Social Learning," IDEI Working Papers 17, Institut d'Économie Industrielle (IDEI), Toulouse.
- G. Ellison & D. Fudenberg, 2010. "Rules of Thumb for Social Learning," Levine's Working Paper Archive 435, David K. Levine.
- Ellison, Glenn & Fudenberg, Drew, 1993. "Rules of Thumb for Social Learning," Scholarly Articles 3196332, Harvard University Department of Economics.
- Richard Langlois & Pierre Garrouste, 1996.
"Cognition, Redundancy, and Learning in Organizations,"
1996-10, University of Connecticut, Department of Economics.
- Richard Langlois & Pierre Garrouste, 1997. "Cognition, Redundancy, And Learning In Organizations," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(4), pages 287-300.
- repec:hal:journl:halshs-00267975 is not listed on IDEAS
- David Cayla, 2008. "Organizational Learning: A Process Between Equilibrium and Evolution," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00267975, HAL.
- repec:dgr:kubcen:200546 is not listed on IDEAS
- Ludovic Dibiaggio, 1999. "Apprentissage, coordination et organisation de l'industrie - Une perspective cognitive," Revue d'Économie Industrielle, Programme National Persée, vol. 88(1), pages 111-136.
- Binmore, Ken, 1987. "Modeling Rational Players: Part I," Economics and Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 3(02), pages 179-214, October.
- Richard Arena & Nathalie Lazaric, 2003. "Introduction," Revue économique, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 54(2), pages 323-328.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dau:papers:123456789/5005. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Alexandre Faure)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.