IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

How Likely is the Consensus Projection of Oil Production Doubling in the Persian Gulf?

Listed author(s):
  • Gately, D.
Registered author(s):

    We examine a consensus in most recent long-term projections of the world oil market that OPEC oil capacity and production will increase rapidly over the next two decades to unprecedented levels, more than doubling in the Persian Gulf by 2020. Such projections are not based on behavioral analysis of Gulf countries' decisions; they are merely the calculated residual demand for OPEC oil, the difference between projected world oil demand and non-OPEC supply. We focus especially on the detailed projections of the International Energy Outlook 2001 (IEO-2001) by the Energy Information Administration within the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). Their projections exhibit only minimal price-responsiveness, which leads to conclusion that the underlying model is internally inconsistent. If it accurately represents the price-responsiveness of world oil demand and non-OPEC supply, then both the Reference Case and the High Price Case project future oil prices that are far too low - because these cases rely on supply behavior by Gulf producers that is not in their own self-interest. The IEO-2001 projections of world oil prices could be reasonable, but only if world oil demand and/or non-OPEC supply are much more price-responsive than are represented in their numerical projections. Then, using an updated version of the model from Gately (1995), we demonstrate that the effect of greater priceresponsiveness for world oil demand and non-OPEC supply is to make faster output growth - not higher prices - the reliable path to higher OPEC revenue. We conclude with comments about the plausibility of consensus projections. Oil price in the range $20 to $25 (1999 $/barrel) is plausible, but it requires substantial growth in non-OPEC supply and much greater priceresponsiveness than is assumed in IEO-2001. Projections that Persian Gulf capacity and output will double by 2020, however, seem very implausible. It requires not only that Gulf producers experience high price-responsiveness to any slowdown in their output growth, but also that aggressive output growth must make them significantly better off than more modest expansion efforts. However, it was shown in Gately (1995) that discounted export revenue for the Gulf countries is relatively insensitive over a fairly wide range of output-growth strategies: modest output growth will do just about as well as aggressive growth.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by C.V. Starr Center for Applied Economics, New York University in its series Working Papers with number 01-02.

    in new window

    Length: 16 pages
    Date of creation: 2001
    Handle: RePEc:cvs:starer:01-02
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    C.V. Starr Center, Department of Economics, New York University, 19 W. 4th Street, 6th Floor, New York, NY 10012

    Phone: (212) 998-8936
    Fax: (212) 995-3932
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    Order Information: Postal: C.V. Starr Center, Department of Economics, New York University, 19 W. 4th Street, 6th Floor, New York, NY 10012

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cvs:starer:01-02. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Anne Stubing)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.