IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Efecto Bullwhip y restricciones de capacidad productiva en las cadenas de suministro colaborativas

Listed author(s):
  • Salvatore Cannella

    ()

  • Elena Ciancimino

    ()

  • Mónica López Campos
  • José David Canca Ortiz
Registered author(s):

    El objetivo del presente artículo es profundizar en el análisis de Evans y Naim sobre la relación entre la capacidad de limitada producción y el efecto bullwhip, y actualizarlo en función de las recientes configuraciones de cadenas de suministro colaborativas. Se analizan tres cadenas de suministro con capacidad de producción limitada: la misma cadena de suministro tradicional estudiada por Evans y Naim, una cadena EPOS (Exchange Point of Sales) y una cadena sincronizada. Se adopta un sistema de métricas para evaluar los beneficios de los nodos de la cadena medidos en términos de estabilidad de la orden de pedido, estabilidad de los inventarios, y robustez del sistema, y en términos de beneficios para el cliente, medidos en términos de backlog. Los resultados sugieren que la saturación de la demanda en una cadena tradicional puede generar un doble riesgo": satisfacer una demanda de mercado distorsionada y por lo tanto sobredimensionada a un coste de producción significativamente elevado. Que los efectos negativos de la capacidad limitada están significativamente reducidos en las cadenas colaborativas."******The aim of this paper is to deepen the analysis of Evans and Naim (1) on the relationship between the limited production capacity and the Bullwhip effect, and updated according to recent configurations of collaborative supply chains. We analyze three supply chains with limited production capacity, the traditional supply chain studied by Evans and Naim (1), a chain EPOS (Point of Sales Exchange) and a synchronized chain. Adopting a metrics system to assess the benefits of the nodes in the chain measured in terms of stability of the order, stability of the inventories, and robustness of the system, and in terms of benefits to the client, measured in terms of backlog. The results suggest (I) the saturation of demand in a traditional string can generate a "double risk": to meet a market demand and thus distorted oversized to a significantly higher cost of production. (II) the negative effects of limited capacity are significantly reduced in collaborative supply chains.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL: http://revistas.unicartagena.edu.co/index.php/panoramaeconomico/article/view/378
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by UNIVERSIDAD DE CARTAGENA in its series REVISTA PANORAMA ECONÓMICO with number 006191.

    as
    in new window

    Length: 21
    Date of creation: 12 Dec 2008
    Handle: RePEc:col:000407:006191
    Contact details of provider:

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    as in new window
    1. Piore, Michael J, 1983. "Labor Market Segmentation: To What Paradigm Does It Belong?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 73(2), pages 249-253, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:col:000407:006191. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Revista Panorama Economico)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.