Investment in Machinery and Equipment is Essential to Canada's Future
Machinery and equipment (M&E) is one of the imperative factors that influence Canada’s living standards. M&E investment and development is vital for long-term productivity growth. Despite Canada’s resilience to the global financial crisis, it is still vulnerable to weak future growth due to lingering economic frailties such as low productivity. Canada trails in investment and adoption of information and communications technology (ICT), a sub-group of M&E and the foundation for technological advancement in today’s digital world, compared to a number of advanced economies. Our findings indicate lower investment in ICT combined with lower competition, lower spending in R&D, and barriers to foreign direct investment to be significant factors to Canada’s low productivity. To ensure that sustainable living standards are attained in the future, Canada will need to improve its productivity level, and increasing investment in M&E is an important part of it.
|Date of creation:||Apr 2012|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
Web page: http://www.cga-canada.org
More information through EDIRC
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Sang Nguyen & B.K. Atrostic, 2005. "Computer Investment, Computer Networks and Productivity," Working Papers 05-01, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
- Gu, Wulong & Baldwin, John R., 2009. "Productivity Performance in Canada, 1961 to 2008: An Update on Long-term Trends," The Canadian Productivity Review 2009025e, Statistics Canada, Economic Analysis.
- Someshwar Rao & Jianmin Tang & Weimin Wang, 2002. "The Importance of Skills for Innovation and Productivity," International Productivity Monitor, Centre for the Study of Living Standards, vol. 4, pages 15-26, Spring.
- Andrew Sharpe, 2005. "What Explains the Canada-US ICT Investment Gap?," International Productivity Monitor, Centre for the Study of Living Standards, vol. 11, pages 21-38, Fall.
- Tiff Macklem, 2003. "Future Productivity Growth in Canada: Comparing to the United States," International Productivity Monitor, Centre for the Study of Living Standards, vol. 7, pages 50-57, Fall.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cga:wpaper:120401. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Elena Simonova)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.