IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Some Practical Issues in Maximum Simulated Likelihood

In this paper, I explore ways of recapturing the efficiency property for estimators that rely on simulation. In particular, I show that this can be achieved by exploiting two-step maximum stimulated likelihood (SL) estimation methods that are familiar from classical applications. I also construct a diagnostic test for adequacy of number of simulations employed to guarantee negligible bias for the MSL and provide some evidence on the computational requirements of the Geweke-Hajivassiliou-Keane (GHK) simulator as a function of (a) the dimension of the problem and (b) the number of simulations employed in a vectorized context. I outline how one can derive a similar approach for checking the adequacy of the number of Gibbs resamplings in simulation estimation methods the employ this technique. This chapter also shows how to suitably introduce simulation into classical hypothesis testing methods and provide test statistics (simulated Wald, Lagrange Multiplier, and Likelihood Ratio Tests) that are free of influential simulation noise. Finally, I explain how simulation-variance-reduction techniques, notably antithetics, can improve substantially the practical performance of the GHK simulator and present extensive Monte-Carlo evidence confirming this.

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Paper provided by Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines, LSE in its series STICERD - Econometrics Paper Series with number /1997/340.

in new window

Date of creation: Nov 1997
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:cep:stiecm:/1997/340
Contact details of provider: Web page:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cep:stiecm:/1997/340. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.