IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/bri/accfin/16-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Timeliness of UK Private Company Financial Reporting: Regulatory and Economic Influences

Author

Listed:
  • Mark Clatworthy
  • Michael Peel

Abstract

This paper investigates the effects of both regulation and economic demand on the timeliness of UK private companies' accounting information. We study companies' response to a one month shortening of the statutory filing deadline and hypothesise that companies using accounting to communicate financial information to outside capital providers will be timelier in filing their accounts and less affected by the regulatory change than firms preparing accounts for tax and compliance purposes. Our results indicate that companies producing accounting information for reporting to outside investors publish their accounts significantly more quickly than those filing for compliance/tax reasons, though the change in regulation significantly affects both types of companies. We find a reduction in the average filing time, though the proportion of firms filing late increases after the regulatory change. In addition to incurring financial and non-financial penalties, filing after the statutory limit has important economic consequences because our results show that firms filing late have significantly lower credit ratings. We conclude that both regulatory and fundamental factors are important in private company financial reporting and that the two are sometimes interdependent.

Suggested Citation

  • Mark Clatworthy & Michael Peel, 2016. "The Timeliness of UK Private Company Financial Reporting: Regulatory and Economic Influences," Bristol Accounting and Finance Discussion Papers 16/3, School of Economics, Finance, and Management, University of Bristol, UK.
  • Handle: RePEc:bri:accfin:16/3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/efm/media/workingpapers/accfin_working_papers/afdp163.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Beynon, Malcolm J. & Peel, Michael J., 2001. "Variable precision rough set theory and data discretisation: an application to corporate failure prediction," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 29(6), pages 561-576, December.
    2. repec:bla:jbfnac:v:34:y:2007:i:1-2:p:169-201 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Vito Polito, 2009. "Measuring the Effective Tax Burden in the Real World," Fiscal Studies, Institute for Fiscal Studies, vol. 30(2), pages 247-278, June.
    4. Jensen, Michael C. & Meckling, William H., 1976. "Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 3(4), pages 305-360, October.
    5. Winkelmann, Rainer & Zimmermann, Klaus F, 1995. " Recent Developments in Count Data Modelling: Theory and Application," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(1), pages 1-24, March.
    6. Press, Eric G. & Weintrop, Joseph B., 1990. "Accounting-based constraints in public and private debt agreements : Their association with leverage and impact on accounting choice," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(1-3), pages 65-95, January.
    7. Ole-Kristian Hope & Wayne Thomas & Dushyantkumar Vyas, 2011. "Financial credibility, ownership, and financing constraints in private firms," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 42(7), pages 935-957, September.
    8. Ball, Ray & Shivakumar, Lakshmanan, 2005. "Earnings quality in UK private firms: comparative loss recognition timeliness," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 83-128, February.
    9. Zeileis, Achim & Kleiber, Christian & Jackman, Simon, 2008. "Regression Models for Count Data in R," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 27(i08).
    10. repec:bla:joares:v:36:y:1998:i:1:p:57-70 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Yermack, David, 1996. "Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 185-211, February.
    12. Koenker,Roger, 2005. "Quantile Regression," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521845731.
    13. Fields, Thomas D. & Lys, Thomas Z. & Vincent, Linda, 2001. "Empirical research on accounting choice," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(1-3), pages 255-307, September.
    14. Omer Brav, 2009. "Access to Capital, Capital Structure, and the Funding of the Firm," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 64(1), pages 263-308, February.
    15. Michael Firth, 1997. "The Provision of Non-audit Services and the Pricing of Audit Fees," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(3), pages 511-525.
    16. Hirshleifer, Jack, 1971. "The Private and Social Value of Information and the Reward to Inventive Activity," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 61(4), pages 561-574, September.
    17. Doyle, Jeffrey & Ge, Weili & McVay, Sarah, 2007. "Determinants of weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(1-2), pages 193-223, September.
    18. Machado, Jose A.F. & Silva, J. M. C. Santos, 2005. "Quantiles for Counts," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 100, pages 1226-1237, December.
    19. Brenda Van Tendeloo & Ann Vanstraelen, 2008. "Earnings Management and Audit Quality in Europe: Evidence from the Private Client Segment Market," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(3), pages 447-469.
    20. Mark A. Clatworthy & Michael J. Peel, 2007. "The Effect of Corporate Status on External Audit Fees: Evidence From the UK," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(1‐2), pages 169-201, January.
    21. Jill Collis, 2012. "Determinants of voluntary audit and voluntary full accounts in micro- and non-micro small companies in the UK," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(4), pages 441-468, September.
    22. Elisabeth Dedman & Asad Kausar, 2012. "The impact of voluntary audit on credit ratings: evidence from UK private firms," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(4), pages 397-418, September.
    23. Andrea Szczesny & Aljosa Valentincic, 2013. "Asset Write-offs in Private Firms – The Case of German SMEs," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(3-4), pages 285-317, April.
    24. Neil Garrod & Urska Kosi & Aljosa Valentincic, 2008. "Asset Write-Offs in the Absence of Agency Problems," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(3-4), pages 307-330.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. repec:gam:jrisks:v:7:y:2019:i:3:p:77-:d:246370 is not listed on IDEAS

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bri:accfin:16/3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Ben Auld). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/debriuk.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.