IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Zuschlag erhalten, aber Verlust gebucht - Gefdhrdet der Fluch des Gewinners auch Kapitalmarktprofis?

Listed author(s):
  • Hehn, Elisabeth
  • Abdolkarim Sadrieh

Zwei Experimente mit Entscheidungstrdgern aus der Praxis des Finanzmarkts sind durchgefuehrt worden, um die Frage zu klaeren, ob es Umstände gibt, unter denen der Fluch des Gewinners auch Kapitalmarktprofis gefdhrdet. Die Antwort ist ein klares "Ja". Der Fluch des Gewinners schlug nicht nur im Seminarexperiment zu, in dem spontan entschieden werden musste, sondern auch im Befragungsexperiment, in dem sich die Versuchspersonen fuer ihre Entscheidungen Zeit nehmen konnten und auf alle ueblichen Ressourcen zur Entscheidungsfindung zurueckgreifen durften. Aber es zeigte sich auch, dass Kapitalmarktprofis auf Verluste schnell und zielsicher reagieren, denn Gebote von erfahrenen Teilnehmern waren bedeutend näher an den Gleichgewichtsgeboten als die der unerfahrenen. Bereits nach einer Bietrunde hatten die meisten Praktiker ihr Verhalten so anpasst, dass Verluste verringert oder ganz vermieden wurden.

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Paper provided by University of Bonn, Germany in its series Discussion Paper Serie B with number 463.

in new window

Length: pages
Date of creation: Dec 1999
Handle: RePEc:bon:bonsfb:463
Contact details of provider: Postal:
Bonn Graduate School of Economics, University of Bonn, Adenauerallee 24 - 26, 53113 Bonn, Germany

Fax: +49 228 73 6884
Web page:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bon:bonsfb:463. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (BGSE Office)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.