Exchange Rate Determination: A Model of the Decisive Role of Central Bank Cooperation and Conflict
Opinion is divided on whether it is better to have a single world Â money or variable exchange rates. Â Pope, Selten and von Hagen (2003) Â propose that fresh light would be shed via an analysis that allows Â for seven complexity impacts on the exchange rate that are Â underplayed (where not entirely absent) from current analyses: 1) the Â role of official sector, including its central bank; 2) the numerous Â official and private sector goals; 3) the disparate degrees of market Â power of different sorts of private agents; 4) the documentation that Â essentially all shocks to the exchange rate are generated by human Â decisions; 5) the non-maximising heuristics that in the complex Â economy agents use; 6) heterogenous beliefs. Â This paper analyses a Â closed form game theoretic solution of version 1 of a model that Â combines impacts 1 to 4 with the conventional finance assumption that Â all agents maximise their utility. Â Impact 1) precludes private Â agents being able to destabilise the exchange rate against the Â cooperation of the central banks required by the game theoretic Â solution. Â Impact 4) excludes random events and other exogenous Â shocks such as meteors falling from the sky. Â The rational maximising Â assumption in turn precludes all other sources of shocks and thus any Â need for a variable exchange rate to equilibrate after shocks. Â We Â then modify version 1 of our model substituting for the maximising Â assumption impacts 5 to 7, impacts that allow shocks from humans to Â be consistently incorporated. Â We do so by means of an experimental Â investigation which indicates that central bankers less than fully Â cooperate, leaving scope for private speculators to support their Â preferred currency. Â From the viewpoint of the game theoretic Â equilibrium, the resultant exchange rate changes render equilibrium Â unspecified. Â A single world money avoids disruptive exchange rate Â changes from less than fully cooperating central banks, exchange rate Â changes caused by central bank conflicts and that cannot be Â classified as equilibrating.
|Date of creation:||Dec 2007|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: Bonn Graduate School of Economics, University of Bonn, Adenauerallee 24 - 26, 53113 Bonn, Germany|
Fax: +49 228 73 6884
Web page: http://www.bgse.uni-bonn.de
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Frankel, Jeff & Froot, Ken, 1986.
"Using Survey Data to Test Standard Propositions Regarding Exchange Rate Expectations,"
Department of Economics, Working Paper Series
qt1972q8wm, Department of Economics, Institute for Business and Economic Research, UC Berkeley.
- Frankel, Jeffrey A & Froot, Kenneth A, 1987. "Using Survey Data to Test Standard Propositions Regarding Exchange Rate Expectations," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 77(1), pages 133-53, March.
- Dominguez, Kathryn M & Frankel, Jeffrey A, 1993. "Does Foreign-Exchange Intervention Matter? The Portfolio Effect," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 83(5), pages 1356-69, December.
- Thomas J. Courchene, 1999. "Alternative North American Currency Arrangements: A Research Agenda," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 25(3), pages 308-314, September.
- Harsanyi, John C, 1978. "Bayesian Decision Theory and Utilitarian Ethics," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 68(2), pages 223-28, May.
- Jeffrey A. Frankel & C. Fred Bergsten & Michael L. Mussa, 1994. "Exchange Rate Policy," NBER Chapters, in: American Economic Policy in the 1980s, pages 293-366 National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Frankel, Jeffrey A., 1996.
"REcent Exchange Rate Experience and Proposals for Reform,"
Center for International and Development Economics Research, Working Paper Series
qt62f2p0w1, Center for International and Development Economics Research, Institute for Business and Economic Research, UC Berkeley.
- Frankel, Jeffrey A, 1996. "Recent Exchange-Rate Experience and Proposals for Reform," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 86(2), pages 153-58, May.
- Frankel, Jeffrey A., 1996. "Recent Exchange Rate Experience and Proposals for Reform," Center for International and Development Economics Research (CIDER) Working Papers 233422, University of California-Berkeley, Department of Economics.
- Jeffrey A. Frankel., 1996. "Recent Exchange Rate Experience and Proposals for Reform," Center for International and Development Economics Research (CIDER) Working Papers C96-060, University of California at Berkeley.
- Allais, Maurice, 1972. "Forgetfulness and Interest," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 4(1), pages 40-73, Part I Fe.
- David Cobham, 2006. "The Overvaluation of Sterling Since 1996: How the Policy makers Responded and Why," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 116(512), pages F185-F207, 06.
- Kilponen, Juha & Leitemo, Kai, 2007. "Discretion and the transmission lags of monetary policy," Research Discussion Papers 8/2007, Bank of Finland.
- Kreps, David M. & Porteus, Evan L., 1979. "Temporal von neumann-morgenstern and induced preferences," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 81-109, February.
- Meese, Richard A. & Rogoff, Kenneth, 1983. "Empirical exchange rate models of the seventies : Do they fit out of sample?," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 14(1-2), pages 3-24, February.
- Barry Eichengreen & Charles Wyplosz, 1993. "The Unstable EMS," Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Economic Studies Program, The Brookings Institution, vol. 24(1), pages 51-144.
- Sordi, Serena & Vercelli, Alessandro, 2006. "Financial fragility and economic fluctuations," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 61(4), pages 543-561, December.
- Lucas Papademos, 2006. "Policy-making in EMU: strategies, rules and discretion," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 27(1), pages 25-38, 01.
- Jeffrey A. Frankel, 1985. "The Dazzling Dollar," Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Economic Studies Program, The Brookings Institution, vol. 16(1), pages 199-217.
- Andrew Caplin & John Leahy, 2001. "Psychological Expected Utility Theory and Anticipatory Feelings," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 116(1), pages 55-79.
- Rakesh Bissoondeeal & Jane Binner & Thomas Elger, 2009. "Monetary models of exchange rates and sweep programs," Applied Financial Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(14), pages 1117-1129.
- David Cobham, 2002. "The Exchange Rate as a Source of Disturbances: The UK 1979-2000," National Institute Economic Review, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 181(1), pages 96-112, July.
- Bonpasse, Morrison, 2006. "The Single Global Currency: Common Cents for the World," MPRA Paper 1175, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- K. Borch, 1969. "A Note on Uncertainty and Indifference Curves," Review of Economic Studies, Oxford University Press, vol. 36(1), pages 1-4.
- Wang, Yajie & Hui, Xiaofeng & Soofi, Abdol S., 2007. "Estimating renminbi (RMB) equilibrium exchange rate," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 417-429.
- Hausken, Kjell & Plumper, Thomas, 2002. "Containing Contagious Financial Crises: The Political Economy of Joint Intervention into the Asian Crisis," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 111(3-4), pages 209-36, June.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bon:bonedp:bgse18_2007. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (BGSE Office)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.