IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Should new or rapidly growing banks have more equity?


  • Niinimäki, Juha-Pekka


There is substantial evidence that new banks and rapidly growing banks are risk prone.We study this problem by designing a relationship-lending model in which a bank operates as a financial intermediary and centralised monitor.In the absence of deposit insurance, the bank s limited liability option creates an incentive problem between the bank and its depositors, the likely outcome of which is a reduction in the amounts of resources allocated to monitoring its borrowers.Hence, the bank must signal its safety to depositors by maintaining the equity ratio held.The optimal equity ratio is dynamic, ie new banks need relatively more equity than established banks, which enjoy profitable old lending relationships charter value that reduce the incentive problem.However, if an established bank grows rapidly, its share of old relationships also decreases and the bank will have to raise its equity ratio.With deposit insurance, regulators should set higher equity requirements for new banks and rapidly growing banks than for those in a more established position.The results of the model can be extended to more general inter-firm control of credit institutions. Keywords: financial intermediation, relationship banking, financial fragility, bank regulation, deposit insurance, moral hazard, product quality

Suggested Citation

  • Niinimäki, Juha-Pekka, 2001. "Should new or rapidly growing banks have more equity?," Research Discussion Papers 16/2001, Bank of Finland.
  • Handle: RePEc:bof:bofrdp:2001_016

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item


    financial intermediation; relationship banking; financial fragility; bank regulation; deposit insurance; moral hazard; product quality;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bof:bofrdp:2001_016. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: . General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Minna Nyman (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.