The social costs of an MTBE ban in California (Condensed version)
A careful analysis of the costs and benefits of using MTBE as a fuel oxygenate, as compared to use of its most reasonable substitutes, finds that the net private and social costs of MTBE' s alternatives are substantially higher than those of MTBE. The expected costs of future MTBE use have been revised downwards as a result of the state of California's successful program to replace and monitor underground fuel storage tanks, as well as more complete estimates of the incremental clean up costs from MTBE contamination. Moreover, as California has begun to seriously consider the logistics and costs of removing MTBE from gasoline, it has become clear that the cost of MTBE alternatives is higher than previously anticipated. In light of the information that has come to light since California's 1999 decision to phase out MTBE use by 2003, that decision may merit revisiting.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
|Date of creation:||2002|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: 207 Giannini Hall #3310, Berkeley, CA 94720-3310|
Phone: (510) 642-3345
Fax: (510) 643-8911
Web page: http://areweb.berkeley.edu/library/Main/CUDARE
More information through EDIRC
|Order Information:|| Postal: University of California, Giannini Foundation of Agricultural Economics Library, 248 Giannini Hall #3310, Berkeley CA 94720-3310|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:are:cudare:931. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Jeff Cole)The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Jeff Cole to update the entry or send us the correct email address
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.