IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Groundwater management and the cost of reduced surface water deliveries to urban areas: The case of the central and west coast basins of southern california

  • Sunding, David L.


    (University of California, Berkeley. Dept of agricultural and resource economics)

  • Hamilton, Stephen F.


    (California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo)

  • Ajami, Newsha K.


    (University of California, Berkeley)

Registered author(s):

    The Central and West Coast groundwater basins (“basins” or “Central and West Coast Basins”) are located in southern Los Angeles County. Groundwater produced from these basins provides approximately forty percent of the water supply for residents and businesses in all or parts of 43 cities. The 4 million residents in the area comprise more than ten percent of the total population of the State of California. This report measures the economic costs and benefits of the various program elements encompassed by the proposed judgment amendments (Judgment Amendments) to pumpers extracting groundwater in the basins. Because those pumpers include water agencies, who collectively serve nearly 4 million customers the economic costs and benefits also extend to the region as a whole. The analysis calculates such costs and benefits by modeling basin storage, water supply augmentation, replenishment and water leasing activities, taking into account variations in the availability of imported water. The analysis is conducted at an aggregate level, which means the collection of all water agencies and entities in the Central and West Coast Basins. The analysis conservatively examines only the benefits that would accrue to the current holders of adjudicated groundwater rights in the Basins and does not attempt to quantify the direct or indirect benefits that may accrue to other entities (e.g., entities that may seek to access the “regional” storage space). Benefits are expressed in both annual and present value terms, with present values calculated in 2009 dollars. The potential benefits are calculated based on the use of the storage space by a groundwater right holder whether through a priority right granted under the Judgment Amendments or on a “space available, at risk of spill” basis. Finally, the time frame for the analysis is 2009-2030, the term of the Judgment Amendments.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by University of California at Berkeley, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Policy in its series CUDARE Working Paper Series with number 1081.

    in new window

    Length: 69 pages
    Date of creation: Jun 2009
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:are:cudare:1081
    Contact details of provider: Postal: 207 Giannini Hall #3310, Berkeley, CA 94720-3310
    Phone: (510) 642-3345
    Fax: (510) 643-8911
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    Order Information: Postal: University of California, Giannini Foundation of Agricultural Economics Library, 248 Giannini Hall #3310, Berkeley CA 94720-3310

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:are:cudare:1081. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Jeff Cole)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.