IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-88-470-2342-0_20.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Is technical analysis able to beat market inefficiency?

In: Mathematical and Statistical Methods for Actuarial Sciences and Finance

Author

Listed:
  • Elisa Daniotti

    (Ca’ Foscari University, Department of Management)

Abstract

We started by looking into the opposing views of the market efficiency supporters and technical analysts. We then applied a simple trading rule, i.e. the crossing of two moving averages, to three equity indexes which represent the world leading equity markets: the Dow Jones Euro Stoxx for Europe, the S&P 500 for the USA and the Topix for Japan. We had two aims, the first was to test if the trading rules have predictive power, thus demonstrating that markets are inefficient. The second was, whether their predictive ability could be profitably exploited by traders through an active trading strategy. Our findings revealed that there is not one trading rule among those analyzed that can predict market returns in each market and in any market trend. Moreover, the trading rule with the highest predictive ability is unable to beat a buy-and-hold strategy after trading costs are taken into consideration. However, we established that the rule without predictive power revealed itself to be the most profitable. We can therefore conclude that the equity markets analyzed in our study can be considered efficient and that moving averages result in a reduction in losses during downward trends.

Suggested Citation

  • Elisa Daniotti, 2012. "Is technical analysis able to beat market inefficiency?," Springer Books, in: Cira Perna & Marilena Sibillo (ed.), Mathematical and Statistical Methods for Actuarial Sciences and Finance, pages 165-173, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-88-470-2342-0_20
    DOI: 10.1007/978-88-470-2342-0_20
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-88-470-2342-0_20. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.