Renewing Fast-Track Legislation
From 1975 through 1993, five US presidents were granted fast-track trade negotiating authority by the Congress. This authority has enabled them to submit legislation implementing trade agreements to Congress under procedures that assure an up-or-down vote, without amendments, within a limited time period. Congress sets guidelines for the substance of negotiations and requires notification and consultation at key stages. The assurance of prompt congressional action on the results makes it possible for US trade negotiators to speak credibly for the United States.The fast track procedure has proved a remarkable success, making possible the completion of four major trade agreements: the multilateral Tokyo and Uruguay Rounds, the Free Trade Agreement with Canada, and the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). In 1994, however, this authority lapsed, and President Bill Clinton has lacked the ability to deliver on trade-negotiating commitments such as the creation of a Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA). Congress is expected to consider his specific fast-track renewal proposal this coming fall.In this timely analysis, Destler analyzes experience with fast-track procedures since their enactment. He comes out strongly in favor of fast-track renewal but argues for changes in the process to curb abuses and ensure that Congress retains the ability to decide on major new trade liberalizing initiatives.
|This book is provided by Peterson Institute for International Economics in its series Peterson Institute Press: All Books with number pa50 and published in 1997.|
|Note:||Policy Analyses in International Economics 50|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
Web page: http://bookstore.piie.com/
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iie:ppress:pa50. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Peterson Institute webmaster)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.