Mexico´s Implemenation of the Biodiviersity Convention and the Cartagena Protocol in the GMO Era: Challenges in Principles, Policies and Practices
- Juan Antonio Herrera
Recent developments in genetic modification and the use of Living Modified Organisms (LMOs) in agriculture have ignited a debate over the potential effects of these organisms on biological diversity. This controversy materializes in the clash between the international environmental and trade regimes. Multilateral Environmental Agreements (MEAs), such as the 1992 Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) focus on the preservation of biological diversity and, in the case of the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety (Cartagena Protocol), the safe transfer of LMOs. These Agreements encourage States to base national decisions to allow LMO imports on environmental and risk assessments using the precautionary principle. On the other hand the international trade regime under the auspices of the World Trade Organization (WTO) and regional arrangements such as the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), seek to establish free trade (including trade involving LMOs) by eliminating national level measures that can create trade barriers. However this regime does allow States to enact national protective measures, to preserve human and animal health as well as natural resources, based on scientific evidence. This Dissertation is concerned with Mexico’s implemetation of the CBD, the Cartagena Protocol, and implementation challenges this biodiversity-rich country encounters in this endeavor. It argues that the preservation of biological diversity is paramount, not only for the survival of plant and animal species but also for the subsistence of human beings on earth and that the implementation of these environmental Agreements has the potential to preserve such resources. Mexico’s failure to preserve its indigenous maize from transgenic maize imports is examined as a case study to highlight the difficulties faced by transitional economy countries: in addition to domestic capacity issues they must also meet their obligations under MEAs and the international trade agreements. This Dissertation suggests that Mexico’s difficulties provide some lessons to other countries in implementing these Agreements. It asserts that, although Mexico has embraced the international commitments contained in the CBD and the Cartagena Protocol, the country still faces important legislative, institutional and policy challenges that prevent it from effectively implementing these Agreements. In particular it is argued that the lack of biosafety regulations and long-term environmental policies as well as deficient enforcement systems prevent Mexico from effectively implementing these Agreements. This Dissertation concludes its analysis of Mexico’s implementation of the CBD and the Cartagena Protocol by proposing a number of legal and institutional measures to improve the implementation of these environmental Agreements in Mexico, including the need to strengthen monitoring and enforcement mechanisms in the Cartagena Protocol’s Compliance Co mmittee and the enactment of biosafety regulations to support the implementation of Mexico’s Biosafety Law on GMOs. It also proposes a number of mechanisms that could be adopted at the global and regional level to assist countries in more effectively implementing their obligations.
|This book is provided by Argentine Center of International Studies in its series E-books in International Relations with number 029 and published in 2007.|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
Phone: (+54 - 11) 4644 - 0186
Web page: http://www.caei.com.ar
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cis:ebook0:029. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Ariel González)The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Ariel González to update the entry or send us the correct address
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.
Follow series, journals, authors & more
New papers by email
Subscribe to new additions to RePEc
Public profiles for Economics researchers
Various rankings of research in Economics & related fields
Who was a student of whom, using RePEc
Curated articles & papers various economics topics
Blog aggregator for economics research
Cases of plagiarism in Economics
Job Market Papers
RePEc working paper series dedicated to the job market
Pretend you are at the helm of an economics department
Services from the StL Fed
Data, research, apps & more from the St. Louis Fed