An Empirical Study of Optimal Bank Corrective Action for Indonesia Employing the Dynamic Contingent Claims Model
This study highlights how banking regulation in Indonesia can be improved with a view to enhancing the cost-effectiveness of banking regulation and social welfare, and preventing future financial instability. We employ the Fries, Mella-Barral, and Perraudin (FMP) model (1997) and analyze the model under a robust regulatory regime concept to provide a new framework for banking regulation. Maximum likelihood estimates in VAR and GARCH are applied to monthly data on the market returns and deposit values for relatively-large banks. The results show how the authorities in Indonesia can establish optimal closure rules for each bank, levy "fair" deposit insurance premiums, estimate optimal subsidies (for different deposit insurance premiums) and identify the banks' "imminence to bankruptcy".
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 08 (2005)
Issue (Month): 03 ()
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.worldscinet.com/rpbfmp/rpbfmp.shtml|
|Order Information:|| Email: |
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wsi:rpbfmp:v:08:y:2005:i:03:p:339-376. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Tai Tone Lim)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.