Economic Openness And Income Inequality: Chinese Provincial Evidence In The 1990s
China in the 1990s was a large labor-abundant country at its early phase of global integration. This paper develops a framework that applies a Gini-coefficient–related measure of income inequality to the Heckscher–Ohlin model and analyzes the effects on income inequality of economic openness to foreign trade and capital. Our findings from generalized least squares regression of Chinese provincial data suggest that increased openness tends to lower income inequality in China of the 1990s. Ignoring provincial differentials, China's income inequality decreases as the trade-to-GDP ratio and the interaction between FDI and fiscal deficit increase respectively, though income inequality increases with the deficit-to-GDP ratio and the interaction between trade and financial deepening. With respect to the province-specific effect, however, trade openness and FDI tend to increase income inequality when they are examined jointly with the interaction of financial deepening and government budget balance.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 01 (2012)
Issue (Month): 02 ()
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.worldscinet.com/cepr/cepr.shtml|
|Order Information:|| Email: |
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wsi:ceprxx:v:01:y:2012:i:02:p:1250010-1-1250010-21. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Tai Tone Lim)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.