IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

Changes in Antipsychotic Medication Use after Implementation of a Medicaid Mental Health Carve-Out in the US

  • John Robst

    (Department of Mental Health Law and Policy and Department of Economics, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA)

Background:Background: Many Medicaid programmes now offer behavioural healthcare through managed care organizations. Medicaid programmes are concerned about carve-outs because the use of non-included services may rise, limiting the efficiencies anticipated with the implementation of managed care. There also exist concerns that patients with serious mental illness may receive reduced care through managed care and consequently have poorer outcomes. Abstract: Objective:Objective: This study examined prescription drug utilization among Medicaid recipients with the implementation of a mental health carve-out plan in Florida. In particular, this study examined short-run changes in the utilization of antipsychotic medications among individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia or episodic mood disorders with the implementation of Prepaid Mental Health Plans (PMHPs) in Florida Medicaid. Abstract: Methods:Methods: This study used Medicaid data from 38 counties in Florida that implemented the PMHP programme in 2005 and 2006. The sample was limited to individuals aged ≤64 years who were continuously enrolled in Medicaid. Individuals were required to have at least two diagnoses of schizophrenia, episodic mood disorders, delusional disorders or other nonorganic disorders (three-digit International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision [ICD-9] code of 295-298). Five different outcome measures were examined on a monthly basis for the 6 months pre- and post-PMHP implementation: penetration; adherence; Medicaid expenditures for antipsychotics; polypharmacy (multiple antipsychotic medications); and whether dosing was within guidelines. Generalized estimating equations were used to estimate associations between individual and insurance characteristics, and the outcome variables. The analyses were conducted using SAS procedure GENMOD. Empirical (robust) standard errors were calculated to account for repeated observations on the same individual. Abstract: Results:Results: There were 153 720 monthly observations for the 12 810 people in the sample. Seventy-four percent of the sample was aged between 21 and 54 years, while 65% were female, 30% White, 14% Black and 44% Hispanic. The large proportion of Hispanics stems from the introduction of the PMHP programme in Dade County (Miami). The results indicate the implementation of the PMHP was associated with increased penetration, but reduced adherence, polypharmacy and expenditures by the Medicaid agency. There was no change in the likelihood of prescriptions being written within recommended dosage ranges. Abstract: Conclusion:Conclusion: The introduction of the PMHP was associated with short-run changes in medication utilization among individuals with serious mental illness.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: Pay per view

File URL:
Download Restriction: Pay per view

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Article provided by Springer Healthcare | Adis in its journal PharmacoEconomics.

Volume (Year): 30 (2012)
Issue (Month): 5 ()
Pages: 387-396

in new window

Handle: RePEc:wkh:phecon:v:30:y:2012:i:5:p:387-396
Contact details of provider: Web page:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wkh:phecon:v:30:y:2012:i:5:p:387-396. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dave Dustin)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.