IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

Sample Size and Power for Cost-Effectiveness Analysis (Part 2): The Effect of Maximum Willingness to Pay

  • Henry A. Glick

    (Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA; The Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Philadelphia Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA)

Registered author(s):

    Sample size and power for cost-effectiveness analysis depend on assumptions about the difference in cost and effect, the standard deviations of cost and effect, the correlation of the difference in cost and effect, the α and β errors and maximum willingness to pay (W). The first seven of these parameters share much in common in their effect on sample size and power for cost-effectiveness analysis, including that each is associated with a single pattern of power. W, on the other hand, is unique in that, when plotted for positive values, we can potentially observe any of six patterns of power associated with positive values of W. In addition, as W approaches ∞, power need be neither monotonically increasing nor decreasing and it can be multimodal. In this article, the relationship between W and sample size and power is explained.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL: http://PharmacoEconomics.adisonline.com/pt/re/pec/pdfhandler.00019053-201129040-00002.pdf
    Download Restriction: Pay per view

    File URL: http://PharmacoEconomics.adisonline.com/pt/re/pec/fulltext.00019053-201129040-00002.htm
    Download Restriction: Pay per view

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by Springer Healthcare | Adis in its journal PharmacoEconomics.

    Volume (Year): 29 (2011)
    Issue (Month): 4 ()
    Pages: 287-296

    as
    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:wkh:phecon:v:29:y:2011:i:4:p:287-296
    Contact details of provider: Web page: http://pharmacoeconomics.adisonline.com/

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wkh:phecon:v:29:y:2011:i:4:p:287-296. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dave Dustin)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.