IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

Quality of Life in Irritable Bowel Syndrome

  • Richard Lea

    (Department of Medicine, University Hospital of South Manchester, Manchester, England)

  • Peter J. Whorwell

    (Department of Medicine, University Hospital of South Manchester, Manchester, England)

Registered author(s):

    Quality-of-life (QOL) assessment is becoming increasingly important in the evaluation of the impact of disease and the effect of therapy. This is particularly so for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) where there is often a tendency for a chronic clinical course, but with no associated mortality. Instruments used to study quality of life may be generic or disease specific, and care needs to be taken to ensure that the instrument used has been adequately validated for the purpose intended. Several disease-specific instruments [Irritable Bowel Syndrome Quality of Life (IBS-QOL, IBSQOL) and Functional Digestive Disorders Quality of Life (FDDQL)], in addition to generic measures, are now available for use in IBS. Quality of life in patients with IBS is surprisingly poor, particularly in the population seeking healthcare, where it can be compared with conditions which carry a high mortality, such as ischaemic heart disease, heart failure and diabetes mellitus. Pain severity appears to be an important factor in determining quality of life in IBS, although bowel disturbance and psychological difficulties are also likely to be important. There is limited data on the effect of treatment of IBS on quality of life. Improvement has been reported with dietry modification, drug treatments and hypnotherapy. It is likely that, in the future, QOL measures will become increasingly used as secondary end-points in therapeutic trials in IBS.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Pay per view

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Pay per view

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by Springer Healthcare | Adis in its journal PharmacoEconomics.

    Volume (Year): 19 (2001)
    Issue (Month): 6 ()
    Pages: 643-653

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:wkh:phecon:v:19:y:2001:i:6:p:643-653
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wkh:phecon:v:19:y:2001:i:6:p:643-653. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dave Dustin)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.