IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

Willingness to Pay for Maternal Health Outcomes: Are Women Willing to Pay More than Men?

  • Laura Ternent

    (Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK)

  • Paul McNamee

    (Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK)

  • David Newlands

    (Immpact, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK)

  • Danielle Belemsaga

    (Immpact, Centre Muraz, Bobo Dioulaso, Burkina Faso)

  • Adjima Gbangou

    (Centre de Recherche en Sante de Nouna (CRSN), Nouna, Burkina Faso)

  • Suzanne Cross

    (Immpact, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK)

Registered author(s):

    Background: Only a limited number of studies have specifically sought to analyse and try to understand sex differences in willingness to pay (WTP). Abstract: Objective: To identify the role of sex in determining monetary values placed upon improvements in maternal health in Burkina Faso, West Africa. Abstract: Methods: A contingent valuation survey using the bidding game method was conducted in the district of Nouna in 2005; a sample of 409 male heads of households and their spouses were asked their WTP for a reduction in the number of maternal deaths in the Nouna area. Ordinary least squares regression analysis was employed to examine the determinants of WTP. Abstract: Results: Men were willing to pay significantly more than women (3127 vs 2273 West African francs), although this represented a significantly smaller proportion of their annual income (4% vs 11%). In the multivariate analyses of all respondents there was a significant positive relationship between WTP values and both starting bid and whether there had been a previous maternal complication in the respondent's household. However, there was a significant negative relationship between WTP and female sex. Once interactions between sex and income were taken into account, income did affect valuations, with a positive relationship between higher-income women and WTP values. Abstract: Conclusion: In absolute terms, men were willing to pay more than women, while women were willing to pay a greater proportion of their income. Differences between men and women in their WTP, both in absolute terms and in terms of proportion of income, can be explained by a household effect. Future studies should distinguish between individual income and command over decision making with respect to use of individual and household income, and gain further insight into the strategies used by respondents in answering bidding game questions.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL: http://healtheconomics.adisonline.com/pt/re/ahe/pdfhandler.00148365-201008020-00003.pdf
    Download Restriction: Pay per view

    File URL: http://healtheconomics.adisonline.com/pt/re/ahe/fulltext.00148365-201008020-00003.htm
    Download Restriction: Pay per view

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by Springer Healthcare | Adis in its journal Applied Health Economics and Health Policy.

    Volume (Year): 8 (2010)
    Issue (Month): 2 ()
    Pages: 99-109

    as
    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:wkh:aheahp:v:8:y:2010:i:2:p:99-109
    Contact details of provider: Web page: http://healtheconomics.adisonline.com/

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wkh:aheahp:v:8:y:2010:i:2:p:99-109. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dave Dustin)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.