IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

Direct Medical Costs for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Complications in the US Commercial Payer Setting: A Resource for Economic Research

  • Elise M. Pelletier

    (IMS Consulting Services, Watertown, Massachusetts, USA)

  • Paula J. Smith

    (IMS Consulting Services, Watertown, Massachusetts, USA)

  • Kristina S. Boye

    (Eli Lilly & Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA)

  • Derek A. Misurski

    (Eli Lilly & Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA)

  • Sandra L. Tunis

    (IMS Consulting Services, Noblesville, Indiana, USA)

  • Michael E. Minshall

    (IMS Consulting Services, Noblesville, Indiana, USA)

Registered author(s):

    Background: Medical complications are the key drivers of the direct medical costs of treating patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. However, the published literature shows great variability across studies in the number and type of sources from which these costs for diabetes are obtained. Objective: To provide to researchers a set of costs for type 2 diabetes complications, originally developed for input into an established diabetes model, that are empirically based, clearly and consistently defined and applicable to a large segment of managed care patients in the US. Methods: Patients with 1 of 24 diabetes-related complications between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2004 and with evidence of type 2 diabetes were identified using a nationally representative US commercial insurance claims database. Therapy utilization and complication cost data were extracted for all patients for the 12 months following the first identified complication; data for months 13-24 were obtained for a subset of patients with at least 24 months of follow-up enrolment. Medical costs included both the amounts charged by medical providers and the health plan contracted allowed amounts. Costs were expressed as $US, year 2007 values. Results: A total of 44021 patients with a minimum of 12 months of continuous follow-up enrolment were identified, with a mean age of 56 years; a subset of 32991 patients with at least 24 months of continuous health-plan enrolment was also identified. Among the aggregate sample, 74% of patients were receiving oral antidiabetics, 26% were receiving insulin, 43% were receiving ACE inhibitors and 50% were receiving antihyperlipidaemics/HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) during the first 12 months following the index complication. The majority of patients had at least one physician office visit (99.8%), laboratory diagnostic test (96.2%) and other outpatient visit (97.5%). Six complications (angina pectoris, heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, renal disease, nonproliferative retinopathy and neuropathy) had a prevalence of at least 10%. Allowed amounts for most complications were 30-45% of charges. Myocardial infarction, heart failure and renal disease had the greatest fiscal impact because of the total number of patients experiencing them (7.2%, 14.0% and 11.0%, respectively) and their associated costs; 12-month mean allowed amounts were $US14853, $US11257 and $US13876, respectively, and 12-month mean charged amounts were $US41695, $US30066 and $US34987, respectively. Similarly, in the subset of 32991 patients, these three complications had higher allowed and charged amounts over months 13-24 compared with the majority of other complications of interest. Conclusion: These costing results provide an important resource for economic modelling and other types of costing research related to treating diabetes-related complications within the US managed care system.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Pay per view

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Pay per view

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by Springer Healthcare | Adis in its journal Applied Health Economics & Health Policy.

    Volume (Year): 6 (2008)
    Issue (Month): 2-3 ()
    Pages: 103-112

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:wkh:aheahp:v:6:y:2008:i:2-3:p:103-112
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wkh:aheahp:v:6:y:2008:i:2-3:p:103-112. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dave Dustin)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.