IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

Methodological Challenges Posed by Economic Evaluations of Early Childhood Intervention Programmes

  • Stavros Petrou

    (National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford (Old Road Campus), Headington, Oxford, UK
    Health Economics Research Centre, University of Oxford (Old Road Campus), Headington, Oxford, UK)

  • Ron Gray

    (National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford (Old Road Campus), Headington, Oxford, UK)

Registered author(s):

    Early childhood intervention programmes have emerged in recent years with the aim of fostering the cognitive and social-emotional functioning and physical health of preschool children and enhancing their emerging competencies. This article presents a structured critical appraisal of economic evaluations of early childhood intervention programmes. It highlights a range of methodological issues in the field. These include: the fidelity of the evaluation process; the selection of the appropriate comparison group given the complexity of care routinely provided; the appropriate perspective and coverage of the study; methodological concerns relating to cost and benefit measurement and valuation; analytical requirements relating to the form of sensitivity analysis and the decision rules adopted by decision makers; and the interpretation of the results in the light of contextual factors. It is concluded that more transparent methodological guidance is required for analysts conducting economic evaluations of early childhood intervention programmes in particular and of public health interventions in general. Greater multidisciplinary collaboration between social scientists should also enhance the development of ground-breaking methods in this field.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Pay per view

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Pay per view

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by Springer Healthcare | Adis in its journal Applied Health Economics and Health Policy.

    Volume (Year): 4 (2005)
    Issue (Month): 3 ()
    Pages: 175-181

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:wkh:aheahp:v:4:y:2005:i:3:p:175-181
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wkh:aheahp:v:4:y:2005:i:3:p:175-181. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dave Dustin)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.