IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rcitxx/v28y2025i21p3522-3540.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The congruence effect in tourism activity marketing: the difference between virtual influencers and human influencers

Author

Listed:
  • Lei Wang
  • Yong-Quan Li
  • Wen-Qi Ruan
  • Shu-Ning Zhang

Abstract

Selecting appropriate influencers for different tourism activities has become a challenge in tourism marketing. In response, this study utilised two experiments to systematically reveal the congruence effects between influencers (human vs. virtual) and tourism activities (relaxing vs. challenging) on potential tourists’ willingness to participate. The findings indicate that tourists’ willingness to participate increases when human influencers promote relaxing tourism activities and that perceived reliability and individual attitudes serially mediate this effect. Conversely, tourists’ willingness to participate increases when virtual influencers promote challenging tourism activities, and perceived novelty and individual attitudes serially mediate this effect. This study reveals the matching effects and underlying mechanisms between influencer types and tourism activity types and clarifies the appropriate contexts for different types of influencers in tourism marketing. Moreover, this study offers substantive insights into effective influencer selection strategies, enhancing targeted marketing efforts in tourism activities.

Suggested Citation

  • Lei Wang & Yong-Quan Li & Wen-Qi Ruan & Shu-Ning Zhang, 2025. "The congruence effect in tourism activity marketing: the difference between virtual influencers and human influencers," Current Issues in Tourism, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(21), pages 3522-3540, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rcitxx:v:28:y:2025:i:21:p:3522-3540
    DOI: 10.1080/13683500.2024.2400180
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13683500.2024.2400180
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13683500.2024.2400180?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rcitxx:v:28:y:2025:i:21:p:3522-3540. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rcit .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.