Targeting Housing Allowances in Russia
This analysis addresses the coverage and targeting performance of Russia's housing allowance programme, a programme characterized by very substantial decentralization in programme administration. Coverage in the five sample cities is generally low. Targeting of benefits in these cities -- measured either by the distribution of participants or benefits by income quintile -- is very strong, comparing favorably with the record of social assistance programmes in many countries. Importantly, targeting is found to depend significantly on local programme administration. Moreover, local economic conditions are found to be highly correlated with programme generosity and administrative practices: comparatively prosperous cities fund allowance more generously and have administrative practices that encourage participation of low income households in particular. This is occurring even though most funding for allowances now comes from regional governments. A general conclusion is the importance of including local administrative practices in participation and targeting analyses in cases where local or regional agencies have some degree of discretion in setting these rules.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 6 (2006)
Issue (Month): 2 (August)
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.tandfonline.com/REUJ20 |
|Order Information:||Web: http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/REUJ20|
References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- E. Saburov & N. Tipenko & A. Cherniavskii, 2001. "Budget Federalism and Interbudgetary Relations," Problems of Economic Transition, M.E. Sharpe, Inc., vol. 43(11), pages 76-92, March.
- Martin Lux, 2003. "Efficiency and effectiveness of housing policies in the Central and Eastern Europe countries," International Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(3), pages 243-265.
- Moffitt, Robert, 1992. "Incentive Effects of the U.S. Welfare System: A Review," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 30(1), pages 1-61, March.
- Martin Lux, 2003. "Efficiency and effectiveness of housing policies in the Central and Eastern Europe countries," European Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 3(3), pages 243-265, December.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:eurjhp:v:6:y:2006:i:2:p:191-220. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Michael McNulty)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.