Assessing the stability of Gaussian mixture models for monthly returns of the S&P 500 index
The study analyses the unconditional distribution of monthly S&P 500 stock index returns for the long-run time period 1871-2004. The return distribution can be adequately described by a mixture of two Gaussian normal distributions. However, when analysing sub-samples of this long-time horizon, substantial deviations between the empirical and the estimated two-component distribution become evident. Formal tests clearly reject the hypothesis of random draws from the estimated distribution. A comprehensive analysis of ten-year windows within the framework of a rolling window strategy reveals that window-specific estimated two-component mixtures can adequately describe the empirical distributions in almost all windows. Nevertheless, the substantial variation in the weight of the mixtures as well as in the parameters of the mixed distributions suggests that there are severe difficulties involved in maintaining the notion of an underlying distribution being constant to a certain degree.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 3 (2007)
Issue (Month): 4 ()
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAFL20 |
|Order Information:||Web: http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/RAFL20|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:apfelt:v:3:y:2007:i:4:p:215-220. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Michael McNulty)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.