IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investors reaction to dividend announcements: parametric versus nonparametric approach


  • Walid Saleh


Since the seminal works of Ball and Brown (1968) and Fama et al. (1969), event studies have served an important purpose in capital market research as away of testing stock price reaction towards a particular event. The ordinary least squares estimation method (OLS) has been employed in most extant research. However, if the assumed normality assumption is violated, then the OLS procedure will produce bias estimate to abnormal returns. Therefore, some authors (e.g. Dombrow et al., 2000) suggest a nonparametric approach to estimate the market model such as Theil (1950). This paper aims to examine investors' behavior prior to dividend announcements. The results indicate that the daily abnormal returns depart considerably from normality and that Theil's estimation procedure produces higher standardized abnormal returns than that of the OLS estimation procedure. Furthermore, the results confirm that investors achieve positive abnormal returns in the pre-announcement period. This paper concludes that some investors have access to information prior to become public.

Suggested Citation

  • Walid Saleh, 2007. "Investors reaction to dividend announcements: parametric versus nonparametric approach," Applied Financial Economics Letters, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 3(3), pages 169-179.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:apfelt:v:3:y:2007:i:3:p:169-179
    DOI: 10.1080/17446540600650015

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.


    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.

    Cited by:

    1. Luca Aguzzoni & Gregor Langus & Massimo Motta, 2013. "The Effect of EU Antitrust Investigations and Fines on a Firm's Valuation," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(2), pages 290-338, June.

    More about this item


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:apfelt:v:3:y:2007:i:3:p:169-179. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Chris Longhurst). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.