IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Did Market Reform Make Risk Evaluation On Japanese Firms Easier?: An Evidence From Credit Ratings

Listed author(s):
  • Nobuyoshi YAMORI

    ()

    (Nagoya University, Graduate School of Economics, Japan)

  • Yoshihiro ASAI

    ()

    (Josai University, Department of Contemporary Policy Studies, Japan)

If other things be constant, more extensive and timely disclosure should result in more accurate evaluation of firm's risks. However, there is a lack of research that investigates how effective various reforms in disclosure regulation is in terms of evaluating corporate risks. This lack of research is mainly because there are not appropriate data sets and methodology to be used for empirical tests. We follow Morgan (2002) and investigate whether credit rating companies likely agreed on the evaluation on Japanese firms' risks after the financial and accounting Big Bang. If there are still large disagreements among credit rating companies, this fact suggests that the current disclosure is not enough for outsiders to evaluate firms, or that there is an inherent limitation of disclosure usage. Also, we are interested in what sectors credit rating companies more often disagree on. Contrary to Morgan (2002), which pointed out that financial industries, such as banks and insurance companies, are difficult to evaluate, we failed to find that disagreements among credit rating companies over banks and insurance companies are larger than disagreements over other industries. However, consistent with Morgan (2002), we found that public utilities industry is easy to evaluate.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://cesmaa.eu/journals/jarf/index.php
Download Restriction: no

Article provided by ASERS Publishing in its journal Journal of Advanced Studies in Finance.

Volume (Year): II (2010)
Issue (Month): 1 (June)
Pages: 74-83

as
in new window

Handle: RePEc:srs:jarf12:6:v:2:y:2010:i:1:p:74-83
Contact details of provider: Web page: http://www.cesmaa.eu/journals/jarf/index.php

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:srs:jarf12:6:v:2:y:2010:i:1:p:74-83. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Mădălina Constantinescu)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.