IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sro/srosro/1996-4-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Qualitative Data Analysis: Representations of a Technology: a Comment on Coffey, Holbrook and Atkinson

Author

Listed:
  • Nigel Fielding

    ()

  • Ray Lee

    ()

Abstract

Whether computer assisted data collection methods should be used for survey data collection is no longer an issue. Most professional research organizations, commercial, government and academic, are adopting these new methods with enthusiasm. Computer assisted telephone interviewing (CATI) is most prevalent, and computer assisted personal interviewing (CAPI) is rapidly gaining in popularity. Also, new forms of electronic reporting of data using computers, telephones and voice recognition technology are emerging. This paper begins with a taxonomy of current computer assisted data collection methods. It then reviews conceptual and theoretical arguments and empirical evidence on such topics as: (1) respondents and interviewer acceptance of new techniques, (2) effect of computer assisted interviewing on data quality, (3) consequences for survey costs and (4) centralized vs. decentralized deployment of CATI.

Suggested Citation

  • Nigel Fielding & Ray Lee, 1996. "Qualitative Data Analysis: Representations of a Technology: a Comment on Coffey, Holbrook and Atkinson," Sociological Research Online, Sociological Research Online, vol. 1(4).
  • Handle: RePEc:sro:srosro:1996-4-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.socresonline.org.uk/1/4/lf.html
    Download Restriction: no

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ezzamel, Mahmoud & Robson, Keith & Stapleton, Pam, 2012. "The logics of budgeting: Theorization and practice variation in the educational field," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 37(5), pages 281-303.
    2. repec:dau:papers:123456789/2506 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Mary A. Malina & Hanne S.O. Nørreklit & Frank H. Selto, 2011. "Lessons learned: advantages and disadvantages of mixed method research," Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 8(1), pages 59-71, April.
    4. repec:dau:papers:123456789/3258 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Lionel Garreau & Rodrigo Bandeira-De-Mello, 2008. "Possibilités et pièges liés à l'utilisation des logiciels dans le processus d'analyse au travers de la théorie enracinée," Post-Print halshs-00339851, HAL.
    6. Muhammad Chowdhury, 2015. "Coding, sorting and sifting of qualitative data analysis: debates and discussion," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 49(3), pages 1135-1143, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sro:srosro:1996-4-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Catherine Norris). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.