Author
Listed:
- Emmanuel Dubois
(Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne (EPFL), Hydraulic Construction Platform
Universite du Quebec a Montreal (UQAM), GEOTOP research center and Department of Atmospheric and Earth Sciences)
- Taha Loghmani-Khouzani
(Dresden University of Technology (TU Dresden)
United Nations University Institute for Integrated Management of Material Fluxes and of Resources (UNU-FLORES))
- Susanna Ottaviani
(University of Trento, Department of Civil, Environmental, and Mechanical Engineering (DICAM))
- Livia Serrao
(University of Trento, Department of Civil, Environmental, and Mechanical Engineering (DICAM))
- Eleanor Starkey
(Northumbria University, School of Geography and Natural Sciences)
Abstract
Nature-based solutions (NbS) leverage natural processes to address societal and environmental challenges. In recent years, they have gained significant global attention as integrated strategies that enhance resilience and sustainability amid global change. NbS are particularly relevant in complex and rapidly evolving urban environments, where water management is critical for mitigating hazards and preserving resources. However, assessing NbS performance remains challenging due to their multidisciplinary nature and local socio-geographical dependencies. This study presents a systematic literature review to evaluate whether current water-related NbS performance assessments adequately capture their full range of benefits within urban environments. Based on an analysis of 111 peer-reviewed scientific studies, this review examines: (1) the backgrounds of experts reporting on NbS and the types of NbS assessed, (2) existing evaluation methods, (3) the extent to which global interconnected challenges, such as climate change and water resiliency, are addressed, and (4) the involvement of stakeholders and citizens in NbS methodologies. Key findings indicate that assessment parameters collectively address multiple benefits but remain fragmented and narrowly focused, highlighting the lack of genuinely integrated multi-benefit assessments. This was related to the fact that most researchers interested in NbS performance assessment were concentrated in a few research areas and relied on a limited number of parameters, while stakeholder involvement remained very limited. Frameworks addressing global interconnected challenges (i.e., the SDGs and Resource Nexus) also proved difficult to apply as evaluation tools. It was identified that incorporating citizen science can fill empirical data gaps and strengthen post-implementation assessments while enhanced transdisciplinary collaboration across scientific, policy, and community domains is crucial for developing comprehensive assessment frameworks. As the first comprehensive synthesis dedicated to performance assessment methods for water-related NbS in urban settings, this review establishes a benchmark for the field. Researchers, policymakers, and practitioners are encouraged to collaborate in advancing NbS and translating these insights into action.
Suggested Citation
Emmanuel Dubois & Taha Loghmani-Khouzani & Susanna Ottaviani & Livia Serrao & Eleanor Starkey, 2025.
"Are water-related nature-based solutions (NbS) assessed for their full multi-benefit potential? A review from an urban perspective,"
Sustainability Nexus Forum, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 1-26, December.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:sumafo:v:33:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s00550-025-00581-1
DOI: 10.1007/s00550-025-00581-1
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sumafo:v:33:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s00550-025-00581-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.