Author
Listed:
- Annalina Sarra
(University “G.d’Annunzio” of Chieti-Pescara)
- Maila Pentucci
(University “G.d’Annunzio” of Chieti-Pescara)
- Eugenia Nissi
(University “G.d’Annunzio” of Chieti-Pescara)
Abstract
In the era of digital plenitude, educational institutions face persistent challenges in aligning their strategies with technological advancements, adopting a learning-ecosystem perspective. Following the digital overload imposed by the pandemic, teachers consider technology integration indispensable, but their extensive use in schools has also triggered resistance attitudes. This study aims to explore teachers’ beliefs on the use of digital technologies in education, focusing on three main aspects: (1) the perceived effectiveness of digital tools, (2) their impact on learning, and (3) the challenges related to their integration in teaching practices. To achieve this, we analyze 898 open-ended responses, collected through a questionnaire concerning digital learning ecosystems. To automate the analysis of open-ended responses, we adopt a Structural Topic Model (STM). STM, an extension of the Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) topic modeling technique, integrates features from a correlated topic model and the sparse additive generative topic model. The underlying assumption of STM remains that the documents are based on a combination of topics. However, the model allows correlations between topic proportions, enabling exploration of how both the prevalence of topics and their associated content may vary based on covariates. The first results concern the identification of some themes that clearly fit with what the recent literature highlights, including the interplay between digital education and early childhood, as well as the pressing issue of teacher training in technology; the possibility of clustering teachers’ postures and attitudes according to their beliefs.
Suggested Citation
Annalina Sarra & Maila Pentucci & Eugenia Nissi, 2025.
"Teachers’ Beliefs on the use of Digital Technologies at School: Text Mining of Open-Ended Questions,"
Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 180(1), pages 331-352, October.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:soinre:v:180:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s11205-025-03652-4
DOI: 10.1007/s11205-025-03652-4
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:soinre:v:180:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s11205-025-03652-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.