Author
Abstract
Patentability assessment is the most critical stage of the patent registration process. For an invention to be granted a patent, it must meet the patentability criteria of novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability. Evaluating the novelty and inventive step requires a comparison of patent texts in terms of their technical scope. This comparison is conducted by experts from authorized patent offices and communicated to applicants through official reports. Under the EP and PCT conventions, patentability evaluations are expressed in search reports using the categories X, Y, and A. Due to the lengthy and complex structure of patent texts, as well as the specialized nature of novelty and inventive step comparisons, patentability assessment is a challenging and time-consuming process. Consequently, patent registration timelines are extended, and inventions are often submitted prematurely, before reaching a patentable level of development. The aim of this study is to address the patentability assessment problem from a unique perspective, distinguishing it from other semantic similarity tasks, by proposing a semantic similarity model specifically focused on patentability evaluation. The proposed model generates patentability text pairs with a focus on patent claims and determines the similarity between these pairs using the X, Y, and A categorization. The experiment of the proposed model shows that the integration of the Siamese network structure with CNN and LSTM deep learning architectures has proven to play a highly effective role in achieving accurate results. By utilizing the X, Y, and A codes identified by experts in published patent search reports for model training, this study marks a significant step forward in solving the patentability assessment problem.
Suggested Citation
Ahmet Kayakökü & Aslıhan Tüfekci, 2025.
"A novel patentability detection model based on Siamese network,"
Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 130(10), pages 5401-5440, October.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:scient:v:130:y:2025:i:10:d:10.1007_s11192-025-05425-9
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-025-05425-9
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
More about this item
Keywords
;
;
;
;
;
JEL classification:
- O32 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:130:y:2025:i:10:d:10.1007_s11192-025-05425-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.